人工智能减轻碳足迹:高性能计算协同迈向净零排放
Artificial Intelligence to Mitigate Carbon Footprint: High-Performance Computing Synergies on the Way to Net-Zero (原題)
Sheetal Thapa, Asha Rani N R
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本章综述AI在降低碳足迹中的作用,涵盖实时排放监测、预测建模和可持续决策。通过案例(如Google数据中心、IBM绿色地平线、Climate TRACE)展示AI应用,并讨论高性能计算、伦理问题及政策框架。
English
This chapter reviews AI's role in reducing carbon footprints, covering real-time emissions monitoring, predictive modeling, and sustainable decision-making. It presents case studies (Google data centers, IBM Green Horizon, Climate TRACE) and discusses HPC, ethics, and policy alignment with NDCs.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本正在推进SSBJ披露和GX战略,AI在排放监测和优化中的应用有助于企业应对披露要求并提升竞争力。本章提供国际案例,可启发日本企业采用AI进行碳管理。
In the global GX context
Globally, AI is increasingly used for climate disclosure and emissions tracking, aligning with ISSB and CSRD requirements. This chapter offers a broad overview and case studies that can inform corporate strategies and policy frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive overview of AI applications for emissions reduction, useful for identifying research gaps.
🏢実務担当者:Highlights practical AI use cases for carbon management, which can be adapted for corporate sustainability strategies.
🏛政策担当者:Discusses policy alignment with NDCs and the role of AI in climate action, relevant for regulatory frameworks.
📄 Abstract(原文)
The chapter reviews the transformative power of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in improving the environmental effects of anthropogenic activities by lowering carbon footprints in key sectors of the economy. As the problem of climate change becomes an existential crisis, introducing AI into climate action plans has created new capabilities in real-time emissions monitoring, predictive modeling, and sustainable decisionmaking. The chapter introduces the discussion of carbon emissions in the context of the Anthropocene epoch and states the central role of AI in environmental monitoring systems. It provides a systematic examination of direct and indirect sources of emissions and sectoral patterns of emissions in energy, transportation, agriculture, and industry, with the help of indicators such as CO2e and life cycle assessments. The main part of the chapter examines how the latest AI methods, such as machine learning and deep learning, and edge computing, are being used to monitor, forecast, and minimize emissions in a more precise and timely fashion. Scalable carbon reductions are seen through smart grids, precision agriculture, and AI-optimized industrial operations. It is followed by a set of international case studies, such as the optimization of Google data centers, the Green Horizon Project by IBM, or AI-powered efforts of Climate TRACE, that demonstrate how it can be done in practice and what practical results can be achieved. The issue of High-Performance Computing (HPC) in promoting the scalability and efficiency of AI-enabled climate simulations is also discussed in the chapter. Ethical issues, including the energy requirements of AI itself, algorithmic bias, and global fairness, are also reviewed considerably to deploy AI responsibly. In addition, it goes further to policy frameworks where there is a mention of the compatibility of the AI technologies with the Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), international standards of sustainability, and the role of public-private partnerships. The final segments make some predictions about the future, such as the rise of low-power machine learning models, AI-blockchain convergence in carbon credit validation, and sustainable AI strategic road mapping. The chapter gives a thorough and future-focused overview of how AI can be both an instrument and a priority on the path to a net-zero carbon future.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.2174/9798898816032126010012first seen 2026-09-03 05:17:02
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。