gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Paradox of Sustainable Agricultural Policy under Climate Change in South Africa

気候変動下における南アフリカの持続可能な農業政策のパラドックス (AI 翻訳)

Kenny Kutu, Sonali Das, Rangan Gupta

ジャーナル2026-05-20#政策
DOI: 10.1201/9781003503804-19
原典: https://doi.org/10.1201/9781003503804-19

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、南アフリカの持続可能な農業政策案をESGの観点から評価し、生物学的生産性や経済的持続可能性などの5つの柱に基づくギャップを特定。フィンランドなど5カ国の政策比較から、既存の地域政策とESG枠組みの統合が気候リスク軽減に重要と結論づける。

English

This paper evaluates South Africa's Draft Policy on Agriculture in Sustainable Development through five ESG-related pillars, identifying shortcomings. By comparing policies from five countries, it concludes that integrating local policies with ESG frameworks is crucial for effective climate risk mitigation in South African agriculture.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

南アフリカ事例ではあるが、農業セクターへのESG統合という観点から日本の農政や食品企業のサステナビリティ開示にも示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

While focused on South Africa, this paper offers comparative insights for global policymakers on integrating ESG pillars into agricultural climate adaptation strategies, relevant to TCFD and ISSB frameworks in the agricultural sector.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Useful for researchers studying climate adaptation policies and ESG integration in agriculture.

🏢実務担当者:Policymakers and agricultural stakeholders can learn from identified gaps and international best practices for sustainable agriculture.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for stronger ESG alignment in agricultural policies to address climate risks.

📄 Abstract（原文）

As physical climate risks continue to adversely affect agriculture globally, policymakers have designed and implemented frameworks to mitigate risks through the promotion of sustainable agriculture. Despite prescribing useful risk mitigation pathways, South Africa’s (SA’s) Draft Policy on Agriculture in Sustainable Development falls short in comprehensively addressing environmental, social, and governance (ESG) concerns in the agriculture sector. Thus, we evaluated the effectiveness of the Draft Policy through the lens of five pillars of sustainable agriculture, namely: biological productivity, economic viability, natural resource protection, risk reduction, and social acceptance. Furthermore, this study identifies potential inclusions to address the shortcomings of the Draft Policy by drawing insights from agriculture policies in Finland, India, Indonesia, Mozambique, and Norway. We find that the integration of existing local policies with relevant ESG frameworks in the ‘Final’ version of the Sustainable Agriculture Policy is integral to ensuring effective climate risk mitigation in SA’s agriculture sector.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。