都市空間計画への自然基盤ソリューションの統合：雨水管理、緑地最適化、都市バイオエコノミー
Integrating Nature-Based Solutions into Urban Spatial Planning: Stormwater Management, Green Space Optimization and the Urban Bioeconomy (原題)
Viktorija Brndevska Stipanović, Ivana Janeska Stamenkovska, Kiril Sotirovski
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
都市の表面被覆化で従来の灰色インフラが限界を迎える中、ブルー・グリーンインフラ（BGI）6類型を都市空間計画の手段として評価した統合的レビュー。272件の文献を分類した結果、水文的機能の研究が43.4%を占める一方、バイオエコノミー的評価は17.3%、正式な経済評価手法の適用は8.8%にとどまる。6類型は代替ではなく補完関係にあり、緑と灰色のハイブリッド構成が極端気象下でより頑健だと示す。今後の鍵は更なる水理文書化ではなく、ライフサイクル費用分析や性能基準型計画手法であると結論づける。
English
An integrative review of six nature-based solution typologies (rain gardens, blue–green roofs, bioswales, constructed wetlands, retention ponds, permeable paving) as urban spatial planning instruments, viewed through a bioeconomic lens. Of 272 classified publications, 43.4% address hydrology and only 8.8% apply formal economic valuation. The typologies are complementary rather than substitutable, and hybrid green–grey configurations prove more robust under extreme events. Lifecycle cost analysis and performance-based planning—not further hydraulic documentation—are decisive for mainstreaming blue–green infrastructure.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では都市緑地法・グリーンインフラ推進戦略や適応策の文脈と接続しうるが、SSBJ・有報開示や炭素会計との直接の連動は弱い。自治体の雨水管理計画や都市計画実務者にとって参考になる。
In the global GX context
Speaks to the adaptation and nature/biodiversity strand of global disclosure (TNFD, EU taxonomy's water objectives) rather than to TCFD/ISSB climate metrics. Useful for municipalities framing green infrastructure as an asset with lifecycle costs, though it offers little for corporate disclosure teams.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:都市水文・バイオエコノミー評価の研究ギャップ（経済評価の適用不足）を定量的に示すレビューとして参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:自治体・都市開発の雨水計画でBGI類型の補完関係とハイブリッド構成の頑健性を設計判断に活かせる。
🏛政策担当者:性能基準型計画やライフサイクル費用評価を制度設計に組み込む根拠として活用できる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Rapid urbanization and surface sealing have exposed the limits of conventional grey stormwater infrastructure, prompting a shift toward multifunctional blue–green infrastructure (BGI). This integrative review evaluates six nature-based solution typologies—rain gardens, blue–green roofs, bioswales, constructed wetlands, retention ponds and permeable paving systems—as instruments of urban spatial planning, through a bioeconomic lens. Searches of Scopus and the Web of Science Core Collection, supplemented by Google Scholar, yielded 272 publications classified by publication period, research method and thematic domain. The evidence is uneven: 43.4% of records address hydrological function, and 17.3% bioeconomic valuation; 49.3% are reviews or conceptual contributions, and only 8.8% apply a formal economic valuation technique. The reviewed literature indicates that the six typologies are complementary rather than substitutable, occupying distinct treatment-train positions—source control, conveyance and sub-catchment attenuation—and that hybrid green–grey configurations are more robust under extreme events. Applied economic valuation was identified for rain gardens and permeable paving, partially for blue–green roofs and bioswales, and not for constructed wetlands or retention ponds. Lifecycle cost analysis, disservice-adjusted valuation and performance-based planning instruments, rather than further hydraulic documentation, are likely to be decisive for adopting BGI as a standard municipal utility.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/land15112096first seen 2026-11-05 05:13:28 · last seen 2026-11-06 04:54:39
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。