Low-Carbon Environmental Control in Intensive Duck Houses: Envelope, Ventilation, Heat Pumps, and Moisture Management
低炭素環境制御を目指した集約的アヒル舎：外皮、換気、ヒートポンプ、湿気管理 (AI 翻訳)
MMI Hasan, Hong‐Seok Mun, Eddiemar B. Lagua, Md Sharifuzzaman, Ahsan Mehtab, Jin-Gu Kang, Young-Hwa Kim, Hae-Rang Park, Chul-Ju Yang
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、集約的アヒル舎における低炭素環境制御の経路を統合。外皮設計、換気、ヒートポンプ、湿気管理のエビデンスを整理し、潜熱負荷が支配的なシステムにおいて、水アクセス、敷料管理、換気制御、再生可能エネルギーなどの組み合わせが重要であることを示した。今後の研究には標準化された指標を用いた実証が必要。
English
This review synthesizes pathways for low-carbon environmental control in intensive duck houses. It integrates evidence on envelope design, ventilation, heat pumps, and moisture management, highlighting the need for staged integration of moisture source control, drainage, litter management, controlled ventilation, heat recovery, heat pumps, renewable electricity, and sensor-based control. Future validation with standardized metrics is needed.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では畜産施設のエネルギー消費削減がGX政策の一部として注目されており、アヒル舎に限らず閉鎖型施設への応用が期待される。特に湿度管理とヒートポンプの組み合わせは、日本の高温多湿な夏季に有用な知見を提供する。
In the global GX context
Decarbonizing agriculture is a global GX priority, and this review offers a systematic framework for low-carbon livestock housing. The staged integration approach is transferable to other poultry and livestock facilities, aligning with energy efficiency and renewable energy goals under the Paris Agreement.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This review provides a structured evidence base and identifies research gaps for future low-carbon livestock housing studies.
🏢実務担当者:Duck house operators can adopt the staged integration strategy to reduce energy use and carbon footprint while improving environmental control.
🏛政策担当者:Agricultural decarbonization policies can promote adoption of these low-carbon packages through subsidies or technical guidelines.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Intensive duck production is shifting from greenhouse/curtain-sided houses toward closed, mechanically ventilated systems, yet low-carbon environmental control for moisture-dominated houses remains insufficiently synthesized. Using the preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses extension for scoping reviews (PRISMA-ScR) framework, this review aimed to identify low-carbon environmental-control pathways by integrating evidence on envelope design, ventilation, heat pump, and moisture management. Scopus, Web of Science, and PubMed were searched for English-language articles published during 2018–2025. Direct duck house evidence was separated from transferable poultry, livestock-building, and building-energy evidence. Synthesis shows that water access, wet litter, stocking density, and climate make houses latent-load-dominated systems, affecting relative humidity (RH), ammonia (NH3), particulates, heat stress, welfare, and energy demand. Greenhouse-type houses have low energy use but weak environmental stability, whereas closed/windowless houses improve control and biosecurity but increase dependence on electricity, dehumidification, and backup systems. Low-carbon housing requires staged integration of moisture-source control, drainage, litter management, roof solar-load reduction, controlled ventilation, heat recovery, climate-suitable heat pumps, renewable electricity, sensor-based control, and resilience planning. Low-carbon environmental-control packages should be selected according to house type, climate, and management conditions. Future validation should report standardized energy, carbon, air quality, litter condition, welfare, productivity, cost, and outage-resilience metrics.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/agriculture16121332first seen 2026-06-19 04:52:46
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。