From ESG Finance to Supply Chain Governability: Mechanistic Barriers and Corrective Pathways in Sustainable Corporate Supply Chains
ESG金融からサプライチェーンのガバナンス可能性へ：持続可能な企業サプライチェーンにおけるメカニズムの障壁と是正の道筋 (AI 翻訳)
Wenduan Zhao
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は、ESG金融がサプライチェーンレベルで効果的なガバナンスに結びつかない理由を考察。情報識別、資金調達インセンティブ、グリーンイノベーションの吸収、多層サプライチェーンでの伝達の4つの課題を分析し、開示の不均衡、格付けの不一致、設計の問題、大手企業と中小企業間の能力格差、金融とガバナンスのシグナルが階層間を伝わる信頼できる経路の欠如を指摘。具体的な活動に基づくESG金融、コア企業の調整役強化、一貫した開示と使いやすい格付け、データ共有の改善を提言。
English
This article examines why ESG finance fails to translate into effective supply-chain governance. It analyzes four issues: information identification, financing incentives, green innovation absorption, and transmission across multi-tier chains. Bottlenecks include uneven disclosure, rating disagreements, product designs misaligned with chain processes, capability gaps between lead firms and SMEs, and lack of reliable signaling channels. Proposals include activity-based ESG finance, stronger coordination by core firms, and improved disclosure and ratings with policy support and digital infrastructure.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではSSBJ開示基準や有価証券報告書でのサプライチェーン情報開示が求められており、本稿の指摘は日本企業の実務に直結する。特に多層構造を持つ日本的なサプライチェーンにおいて、大企業と中小企業の能力格差や情報伝達の課題は深刻であり、本稿の分析は政策立案や企業の取り組みに示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper is globally relevant as it addresses key bottlenecks in ESG finance and supply-chain governance highlighted by ISSB, CSRD, and SEC climate rules. The framework for improving disclosure, ratings, and inter-tier coordination offers actionable insights for regulators, firms, and standard-setters working on transition finance and sustainable supply chains.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured analysis of barriers in ESG-to-supply-chain governance, offering a foundation for empirical studies on disclosure and financing mechanisms.
🏢実務担当者:Offers concrete guidance for corporate sustainability teams on how to improve supply-chain coordination, data sharing, and ESG finance alignment.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for policy support in standardizing disclosure, enhancing SME capabilities, and building digital infrastructure for supply-chain governance.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Interest in Environmental, Social and Governance (ESG) finance has grown alongside the effort to decarbonize production networks, yet the translation from finance to governance remains uneven at the supply-chain level. This article asks why. Drawing on the literature, it examines four linked issues: information identification, financing incentives, green innovation absorption, and transmission across multi-tier supply chains. The bottleneck is not simply the amount of green or ESG-labelled capital available. It also lies in uneven disclosure, disagreement across ratings, product designs that fit single firms better than chain processes, large capability gaps between lead firms and SMEs, and the absence of reliable channels through which financial and governance signals can travel from one tier to another. On that basis, the article argues for three adjustments: ESG finance should be designed around concrete supply-chain activities, core firms should play a stronger coordinating role, and the information base should be improved through more consistent disclosure, more usable ratings, and better data-sharing arrangements. None of these steps are likely to work well without policy support, digital infrastructure, and people who can work across finance, ESG, and supply-chain management.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.54254/2754-1169/2026.33727first seen 2026-05-28 05:22:54 · last seen 2026-06-03 05:22:19
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。