Advancing SDG 7 and SDG 13 in BRIC economies through renewable energy transitions and institutional quality while mitigating energy poverty
Collins Adu, Richard Bless Edzi, Daniel Tawiah, Wisdom Edem Drah, Precious Dedei Aryeetey, Edmond Owusu-Afriyie
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
BRIC4カ国（ブラジル・ロシア・インド・中国）の2000〜2024年パネルデータを用い、再エネ消費が炭素強度と電力アクセス（エネルギー貧困の逆指標）に与える影響を制度品質がどう条件付けるかを検証。再エネは炭素強度を低下させるが電力アクセスとの関係は非線形。規制品質や法の支配が高いほど炭素削減効果が強まり、経済政策不確実性も移行効果を左右する。制度と包摂的政策の重要性を示す。
English
Using 2000–2024 panel data for Brazil, Russia, India and China, the study tests whether institutional quality conditions how renewable energy consumption affects carbon intensity and electricity access (an inverse proxy for energy poverty). Renewables lower carbon intensity but show a non-linear link to electricity access; better regulatory quality and rule of law strengthen the carbon-mitigating effect, while economic policy uncertainty shapes transition effectiveness. It frames institutional quality as a conditioning mechanism for SDG 7 and SDG 13 outcomes in major emerging economies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業のGX戦略にとって直接の対象国ではないが、新興国サプライチェーン（Scope 3）や移行金融の投融資先評価において、制度品質・政策不確実性をリスク要因として組み込む視点を提供する。
In the global GX context
Adds to global transition-finance and disclosure scholarship by showing that institutional quality and policy uncertainty mediate whether renewable deployment delivers both decarbonization and energy-access gains — relevant to ISSB/TCFD-aligned transition planning and emerging-market climate finance risk assessment.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:制度品質を再エネ移行とSDG成果の条件付け要因として定式化する実証枠組みを提供する。
🏢実務担当者:新興国拠点・調達先の移行リスク評価で、制度品質と政策不確実性を考慮する根拠になる。
🏛政策担当者:再エネ導入とエネルギー貧困解消を両立させるには規制品質と法の支配の強化が鍵となる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Moving to renewable energy does not necessarily trigger an environmental and social benefit at the same time, especially in emerging economies with institutional limitations and uncertainty in the global energy market. This study investigates if the institutional quality conditions the relationship between the two sustainable-development outcomes (electricity access as an inverse proxy for energy poverty; higher access indicates lower energy poverty and carbon intensity) and renewable energy consumption in the BRIC economies of Brazil, Russia, India and China during 2000–2024. For the study, second generation panel diagnostics, panel cointegration tests, Generalized Least Squares with a correlated error structure, and Panel-Corrected Standard Errors are used to assess the direct and indirect links between renewable energy, institutional quality and the two outcomes. The results show that there is a negative correlation between renewable energy and carbon intensity, reflecting its environmental contribution, but a non-linear correlation between renewable energy and electricity access. The interaction results also suggest that the carbon mitigating effect of RE intensifies with better institutional quality, specifically regulatory quality and rule of law. The effectiveness of the transition is also affected by global uncertainty proxied by economic policy uncertainty. Our results highlight the importance of the role of effective institutions and inclusive policies on energy access for the deployment of renewable energy. The study builds on the literature by conceptualizing institutional quality as a conditioning mechanism between renewable-energy transitions and environmental sustainability and energy-access outcomes in major emerging economies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-05096-3first seen 2026-11-13 04:56:47
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。