From Participation to Well-being: Understanding Social Processes and Outcomes in Nature-based Solutions
参加から幸福へ：ネイチャーベースドソリューションにおける社会プロセスと成果の理解 (AI 翻訳)
Mohamed Tarek Kamar, Vanessa Haines-Matos, André Mascarenhas, Irina Kozban, José Ernesto Mancera Pineda, N´Golo Abdoulaye Koné, Salma N. Talhouk, Sunita Chaudhary, Lisa Biber-Freudenberger
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、気候変動や生物多様性喪失などの社会課題に対処するネイチャーベースドソリューション（NbS）の社会的側面を体系的に捉える概念枠組みを提示する。社会的包摂と正義、知識統合と文化的価値、制度的取り決めという3つの領域に整理し、福祉や生計の安定、社会的一体性などの成果との関連をモデル化する。実証データと文献レビューに基づき、社会的成果がNbSの長期的有効性と正統性を左右するフィードバックループを明らかにする。政策と実践には、文脈に即した社会的配慮の早期統合と社会的成果の体系的モニタリングを提言する。
English
This paper presents a conceptual framework for understanding the social dimensions of Nature-based Solutions (NbS) addressing climate change and biodiversity loss. It categorizes social shaping factors into three domains: social inclusion and justice, knowledge integration and cultural values, and institutional arrangements, linking them to outcomes such as well-being, livelihood security, and social cohesion. Based on a literature review and empirical data from the BioClimSocial project, the model shows feedback loops where social outcomes influence NbS durability and legitimacy. It recommends early integration of context-specific social considerations and systematic monitoring of social outcomes for policy and practice.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、NbSは国土強靱化やグリーンインフラとして注目されるが、社会的側面の考慮は十分でない。本フレームワークは、SSBJ開示や統合報告における自然資本・社会的影響の評価に示唆を与える可能性がある。ただし、具体的な日本事例を含まないため、国内実務への応用には別途検討が必要。
In the global GX context
Global frameworks like the IUCN Global Standard for NbS and the UNEP-led approach emphasize social safeguards, but lack a structured linkage between process and outcome. This paper offers a systematic model that can inform reporting under TNFD (Taskforce on Nature-related Financial Disclosures) and contribute to integrating social dimensions into nature-based climate adaptation strategies worldwide.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a testable framework for empirically examining social-ecological feedbacks in NbS interventions.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a checklist of social principles and outcomes to integrate into NbS project design and monitoring.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for governance structures that track social outcomes to ensure NbS legitimacy and long-term effectiveness.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Nature-based Solutions (NbS) are designed and implemented to address societal challenges, including climate change and biodiversity loss, by protecting, restoring and sustainably managing ecosystems. Yet their social dimension remains poorly defined and inconsistently integrated into planning and implementation. Existing research and guidance often prioritise ecological functions, providing less clarity on how social realities shape outcomes and long-term effectiveness. In this article, we develop a conceptual framework that explores the social dimensions of NbS through two connected facets: the social principles and processes that shape how NbS are developed, implemented and governed, and the social outcomes of NbS interventions, whether intended or unintended. The framework groups key social shaping factors into three domains: social inclusion and justice, knowledge integration and cultural values, and institutional arrangements, and links them to outcomes related to well-being and livelihood security, knowledge, values and culture, and social cohesion and inclusive governance. It is informed by a structured literature review and empirical insights from the BioClimSocial research and development project, including comparative case study analysis, survey evidence and an in-person expert workshop. The framework models how applied principles and designed processes may shape social benefits or trade-offs and how social outcomes may reinforce or weaken future performance of NbS through feedback loops. This perspective positions social outcomes as both indicators of NbS impact and drivers of NbS durability and legitimacy. The article concludes with implications for policy and practice, emphasising early integration of justice-based, context-specific social considerations, systematic monitoring of social outcomes and long-term, adaptive governance approaches.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nbsj.2026.100356first seen 2026-06-21 05:19:54
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。