← 論文一覧に戻る

THE CONFLICT BETWEEN OPERATIONAL RESILIENCE AND GREEN OUTSOURCING IN THE AGE OF GLOBAL SHOCKS

グローバルショック時代における運用レジリエンスとグリーン・アウトソーシングの衝突 (AI 翻訳)

Vasyl NAMONIUK, Arina MALIUHA

Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. International relationsプレプリント2026-01-01#サプライチェーン経営インパクト: 調達リスク対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.17721/1728-2292.2026/1-62/96-104
原典: https://doi.org/10.17721/1728-2292.2026/1-62/96-104

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

多国籍企業がグローバルショックに対応する際、運用レジリエンスとグリーン調達が衝突するパターンを定性比較分析とケーススタディで特定。3つの対応類型（基準維持、妥協、サイレント撤退）と、製造立地が気候脆弱国に集中する構造的アウトソーシングの罠を提示。再生可能エネルギー導入が自動的に安定性をもたらさず、気候資金へのアクセス不平等が途上国の独自移行を阻むと論じる。

English

This study identifies three corporate response patterns to global shocks—maintaining standards, acknowledged compromise, and silent retreat—using QCA and case studies across textile, automotive, tech, and logistics sectors. It reveals a structural outsourcing trap that concentrates production in climate-vulnerable countries and argues that renewable energy adoption alone does not resolve energy stability issues. Concludes that resolving the resilience-green tension requires embedding environmental commitments into crisis management, not keeping them parallel.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本企業はサプライチェーンにおけるScope 3排出やESG開示が重視される中、外部ショック時のグリーン調達とBCPの両立に直面する。本論文は危機対応プロトコルへの環境コミットメント統合の必要性を示し、SSBJ対応やサプライヤー管理に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

This paper speaks directly to the global disclosure agenda (CSRD, ISSB, Scope 3) by highlighting how crisis-induced outsourcing decisions can undermine declared ESG commitments. It offers evidence for integrating environmental criteria into operational resilience planning—a gap in current TCFD/ISSB-aligned risk frameworks—and underlines the role of climate finance in enabling green transitions in supplier countries.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a typology of corporate responses to shocks and a structural trap mechanism linking geopolitical placement to climate vulnerability, useful for supply chain and ESG research.

🏢実務担当者:Actionable insight: embed environmental commitments into crisis management protocols to avoid silent retreat from green outsourcing during disruptions.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights that unequal climate finance access prevents supplier countries from achieving independent green transitions, suggesting policy intervention in trade and development.

📄 Abstract（原文）

B a c k g r o u n d . The global shocks of the 2020s have made the tension between operational resilience and the environmental commitments ofmultinational enterprises one of the central challenges in international supply chain management. The geographical concentration of outsourcing in countries with the highest climate vulnerability intensifies this conflict, creating a vicious cycle in which each shock reproduces the same logic of displacing sustainable practices. The aim of this study is to identify the patterns of conflict between multinational enterprises' pursuit of operational resilience and their green outsourcing objectives, and to assess the structural factors constraining the capacity of outsourcing locations to achieve sustainable development. M e t h o d s. Qualitative comparative analysis and case study method; analysis of corporate responses to four types of shocks across the textile, automotive, technology and logistics sectors; quantitative characterisation of climate risks in outsourcing locations using the Notre Dame Global Adaptation Initiative index; exploratory Spearman rank correlation for a purposive sample of 13 countries. R e s u l t s. Three types of corporate response to global shocks were identified: maintaining standards at the cost of scale, acknowledged compromise, and silent retreat whilst preserving ESG communications. A structural outsourcing trap was identified – a mechanism whereby the geopolitical logic of production placement systematically concentrates it in the most climate vulnerable locations. It was established that the transition to renewable energy in these countries does not automatically resolve the problem of energy stability, as renewable sources are themselves dependent on increasingly unpredictable climatic conditions. A structural imbalance between the environmental and social components of ESG in the fashion industry was identified. C o n c l u s i o n s. The conflict between operational resilience and green outsourcing is systemic and recurs with each new shock through the mechanisms of temporal discounting and the depletion of organisational slack. Structural inequality in access to climate finance renders an independent green transition impossible for outsourcing recipient countries. Resolving the conflict requires the integration of environmental commitments directly into crisis management protocols, rather than their continued existence as a parallel strategic priority.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。