Carbon Budgeting for Military Organisations – Why and How?
軍事組織のための炭素予算編成 ― その理由と方法 (AI 翻訳)
Brynjar Arnfinnsson, Inger Sofie Landgraff, Kristian Blindheim Lausund
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、気候変動がNATOの長期的な存亡リスクであることを踏まえ、軍事組織に炭素予算を導入する方法を提示する。市民部門のベストプラクティスとノルウェー軍の経験をもとに、炭素予算が長期的な作戦上・経済上の利益をもたらすと論じる。予備的結果では、現在のコスト見積もりは将来の排出コストを過小評価しており、気候変動対応技術が戦闘能力向上にも寄与することが示された。
English
This paper argues that military organizations can benefit from carbon budgeting despite geopolitical tensions. Drawing on civilian best practices and Norwegian Armed Forces experience, it shows that carbon budgets reduce climate risks and costs while enhancing warfighting capabilities through new energy technologies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の自衛隊や防衛関連組織が炭素予算を導入する際の参考となる。官民連携での気候変動対応と財政効率化の観点からも重要。
In the global GX context
This paper extends carbon budgeting from civilian to military sectors, highlighting how defense organizations can align with global climate disclosure frameworks. It offers a novel perspective on integrating operational and economic benefits of decarbonization in a high-emissions sector.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers interdisciplinary framework for carbon budgeting in military contexts, linking climate science, operations research, and economics.
🏢実務担当者:Defense planners can use carbon budgets to reduce energy costs and improve operational resilience while meeting climate targets.
🏛政策担当者:Defense ministries should consider carbon budgeting as part of national climate strategies and fiscal planning.
📄 Abstract（原文）
In an era of increasing geopolitical tensions and increased defence spending in allied countries, mitigating greenhouse gas emissions is not the top priority for military organisations. However, climate breakdown and loss of biodiversity remains the most consequential and most likely existential challenge for NATO in the long term [1]. This paper presents how military organisations can introduce carbon budgets, based on best practices from the civilian sector and current experiences from the Norwegian Armed Forces. Further, this paper argues that the introduction of carbon budgets can lead to long-term operational and economic benefits by utilising new technologies and reducing climate-related costs and risks. The approach is interdisciplinary, incorporating insights from environmental science, military operations research and economics. Preliminary results show that i) current cost-estimates underestimate future costs regarding known emissions, as well as unknown costs related to climate risks, and ii) there is a huge potential for increased warfighting capabilities in utilising new, climate-friendly fuel and energy technologies.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.14339/sto-sas-ora-2025-2first seen 2026-06-10 04:48:31
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。