“No Backyard Available”: A Meta‐Synthesis of Renewable Energy Land‐Use Conflicts and the Ladder of Land‐Use Efficiency in Asia
「裏庭なし」：アジアにおける再生可能エネルギー土地利用紛争のメタ統合と土地利用効率のはしご (AI 翻訳)
Dinh-Tien Luong, Chia‐Nan Wang, Jui‐Chan Huang, Ming-Hung Shu, T. Ha, Shun‐Feng Ke
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
高密度なアジア経済圏では、再エネ立地が農地や生態系と競合し「裏庭なし」の構造的制約に直面する。本研究は文献計量分析と質的メタ統合で3つの紛争類型を特定し、GIS技術ポテンシャルが社会コストを過小評価すると指摘。土地利用効率を高める「はしご」型フレームワークを提案し、国家主導の空間計画の必要性を強調する。
English
In land-scarce Asia, renewable energy siting conflicts with food systems and biodiversity, creating a 'No Backyard Available' reality distinct from Western NIMBY. This meta-synthesis identifies three conflict archetypes, critiques GIS-based potential for ignoring social costs, and proposes a 'Ladder of Land-Use Efficiency' to prioritize siting strategies for net-zero transitions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本も農地・林地・国防用地等で再エネ立地の競合が顕在化しており、SSBJ開示やGX推進の中では用地制約が導入ボトルネックとなる。本稿の「土地利用効率のはしご」は、日本の空間計画制度と再エネ促進区域設定に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Global climate disclosure frameworks increasingly require credible transition plans, yet renewable deployment is often stalled by land-use conflicts. This paper's spatial planning framework and social-cost critique offer a policy tool for reconciling net-zero targets with land scarcity under ISSB/CSRD-era scrutiny.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:The mixed-methods synthesis and conflict archetypes provide a testable framework for further empirical work on renewable siting constraints.
🏢実務担当者:Land-use efficiency ladder offers practical siting options (co-location, built-environment integration) for project developers facing permitting risks.
🏛政策担当者:Advocates a policy shift from cost-minimization to state-led spatial planning that internalizes social costs of land displacement.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The renewable energy transition in high‐density Asian economies is defined not by the “Not In My Backyard” (NIMBY) psychology prevalent in Western discourse, but by a structural reality of “No Backyard Available.” This study challenges dominant theoretical paradigms by conducting a bibliometric analysis ( n = 306) and qualitative meta‐synthesis ( n = 52) to map the specific mechanics of land‐use conflict in land‐scarce Asia. The review identifies three pervasive conflict archetypes—the Food‐Energy Nexus, Green‐on‐Green Paradox, and Blue Space contestation—where energy infrastructure directly competes with essential livelihood systems and biodiversity rather than esthetic preferences. A critical assessment gap is revealed, in which GIS‐based technical potential systematically overestimates capacity by ignoring complex tenure systems, subsistence constraints, and the social costs of displacement. To resolve this impasse, the review proposes the “Ladder of Land‐Use Efficiency,” a theoretical framework that prioritizes siting strategies—ranging from built‐environment integration to technological co‐location—based on their ability to decouple energy generation from the consumption of marginal land. The findings demonstrate that achieving net‐zero targets in Asia necessitates a fundamental policy shift from laissez‐faire financial‐cost optimization to active state‐led spatial planning that internalizes the social premium of land integrity. This research provides a prescriptive roadmap for environmental managers to reconcile aggressive decarbonization with the region's complex spatial and socio‐economic realities.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1002/wene.70038first seen 2026-07-31 06:44:10
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。