コスト最小化から共通福祉の最大化へ：福祉最適化されたエネルギーシステム設計とは何か、そしてそれをエネルギー政策設計にどう活かせるか
From cost-minimization to maximizing common well-being: what do well-being optimized energy system designs look like and how can they be utilized in energy policy design? (原題)
Stefan Kronshage, Shima Sasanpour, Johannes Thema, Thomas Pregger, Andreas Meurer, Jens Schmugge, Palmina Tahirukaj, Hans Haake, Sina Diersch, Julia Swagemakers
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、エネルギーシステム最適化の目的関数をコスト最小化から「共通福祉」の最大化へ拡張する枠組みを提示する。OECD福祉概念に基づく指標体系を構築し、REMix最適化モデルに実装、市民選好調査と十分性シナリオでパラメータ化した。政策アクターが福祉指標の重み付けを通じて政策設計やトレードオフ議論に活用できる点を論じる。
English
This study extends energy system optimization beyond cost-minimization toward maximizing 'common well-being.' It builds an OECD-based well-being indicator system, operationalizes it in the REMix optimization framework, and parametrizes it via a representative citizen survey and a sufficiency scenario. The authors show how policymakers can use the framework to weight well-being dimensions and quantitatively discuss trade-offs, including for sufficiency policies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では第7次エネルギー基本計画やGX推進戦略が供給安定・経済性・環境の三原則を掲げるが、福祉や十分性を定量指標として組み込む視点は乏しい。本枠組みは、エネルギー政策の評価軸を多様化し、国民対話型の政策設計に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, transition planning under ISSB/TCFD and national energy strategies remain largely cost- and emissions-centric. This work offers a replicable method to embed well-being and sufficiency metrics into energy system modeling, complementing climate disclosure with societal outcome indicators relevant to just-transition and policy design debates.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a replicable methodology for integrating well-being indicators into energy system optimization models like REMix.
🏢実務担当者:Limited direct use, but signals emerging policy evaluation criteria beyond cost that may shape long-term energy procurement and strategy assumptions.
🏛政策担当者:Offers a quantitative framework to weigh well-being trade-offs and justify sufficiency-oriented energy policies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Extended abstract 2-223-26 The energy transition is made for humans. Individual well-being, therein, is strongly connected to our societal foundation and the sharing of common goods within planetary boundaries1. Yet, the vast majority of energy modeling is mainly directed to cost minimization. In the project ENERGOOD2 we have developed a framework which optimizes technical energy system designs in regard to their societal well-being implications. A new indicator system for ‘common well-being’ has been elaborated, based on the OECD well-being concept. We have operationalized these indicators for quantification in the comprehensive energy system optimization framework REMix3. For the parametrization, we have conducted a representative survey, designed to identify citizens’ preferences and perceptions regarding well-being aspects and energy technologies. In this assessment framework, we incorporated a sufficiency scenario from the EnSu4 research project. An integrated common well-being optimization is run, resulting in a well-being-optimized energy supply system design. Our questions are: How can the findings be utilized for sufficiency- and well-being-oriented policies? How can this framework be used by political actors? We see the following levers: Political actors can use the framework and its results to promote energy system developments which yield a maximum contribution to well-being, based on a weighting of indicators representing the actor’s objectives. Even if policies do not pursue a holistic well-being maximization, degrees of freedom in a given policy design can be utilized for remaining well-being maximization. The framework can possibly develop an even higher value in an explorative and discursive process of designing policies and instruments. Actors involved in policy design are enabled to discuss trade-offs between different dimensions of well-being quantitatively, including monetary implications. Sufficiency policies lack the promoting factor of commercial marketability. However, a subset of well-being indicators yields higher benefits with less energy consumption. These benefits are made accessible to sufficiency-promoting policies quantitatively by the framework we have developed. Acknowledgements Johannes Kochems (DLR), Robin König (DLR) and Ulrich Frey (Universität Graz) References 1) Raworth 2012 2) Supported by the Federal Ministry of Economic Affairs and Energy (03EI1091A) 3) https://joss.theoj.org/papers/10.21105/joss.06330, https://gitlab.com/dlr-ve/esy/remix 4) https://energysufficiency.de/en/startseite-english/ Download presentation.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.66506/essp.161first seen 2026-09-16 04:35:57
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。