← 論文一覧に戻る

Research on the Application of Environmental Policy based on Nudge Theory

ナッジ理論に基づく環境政策の応用に関する研究 (AI 翻訳)

Shaoheng Chen

Journal of Management and Social Development📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-01#政策
DOI: 10.62517/jmsd.202612303
原典: https://doi.org/10.62517/jmsd.202612303

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、環境政策におけるナッジ理論の適用を倫理的観点から検討し、自律性・操作、透明性・民主的正当性、文脈依存性、長期的効果、公平性の5つの倫理的懸念を特定する。これに対応するグリーンナッジの5本柱のガバナンス枠組みを構築し、政策立案者向けの実践的ツールを提供する。

English

This paper examines the application of nudge theory in environmental policy from an ethical perspective, identifying five core ethical concerns: autonomy, transparency, context-dependency, long-term effectiveness, and fairness. It proposes a governance framework with five pillars for green nudging and provides practical tools for policymakers to promote sustainability ethically.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では行動インサイトの政策応用が進むが、環境分野での倫理枠組みは未整備。本論文の枠組みは、日本の環境政策や自治体の脱炭素施策に行動科学を導入する際の倫理的指針として参考になる。

In the global GX context

Globally, behavioral insights are increasingly used in climate policy, but ethical guidelines are lacking. This paper offers a governance framework that can inform the design of green nudges in line with sustainability goals, relevant for policymakers worldwide.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Behavioral economics and environmental policy researchers can use the framework as a basis for empirical testing.

🏢実務担当者:Sustainability teams can apply the ethical principles to design transparent and fair green nudges in corporate contexts.

🏛政策担当者:Policymakers can adopt the framework to ensure ethical integrity when implementing behavioral environmental policies.

📄 Abstract(原文)

This paper investigates the application of nudge theory in environmental policy, focusing on its effectiveness, limitations, and ethical controversies. Through a review of behavioral policy literature, this study determines five core ethical concerns: Autonomy and Manipulation, Transparency and Democratic Legitimacy, Context-Dependency and Cross-Cultural Validity, Limited Long-term Effectiveness, and Fairness and Distributive Justice. In return to these concerns, this paper constructs a governance framework for the five pillars of green nudging: Initiative Enhancement Design, Transparency and Explainability, Cultural Adaptability, Long-term Effectiveness Assurance, and Fairness and Distributive Justice. This paper conducts a literature based conceptual review and the framework is based on empirical evidence from diverse geographical contexts. A set of tools that are both theoretically grounded and practical are provided in this study for policymakers, enabling them to use methods of behavioral insights to promote environmental sustainability without violating ethical responsibilities.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。