← 論文一覧に戻る

気候立憲主義と国家の積極的義務：2024～2025年の国際気候意見書後の公法

CLIMATE CONSTITUTIONALISM AND THE POSITIVE OBLIGATIONS OF THE STATE: PUBLIC LAW AFTER THE INTERNATIONAL CLIMATE OPINIONS OF 2024–2025 (原題)

Şenyılmaz Doç. Dr. Dilek

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-08-05#政策
DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.21800349
原典: https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21800349

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、気候変動が環境政策から憲法・行政法・人権法の中心課題へと移行したことを論じる。国際的な気候判例を踏まえ、国家が法的拘束力のある排出削減枠組みの構築、測定可能な削減経路の設定、気候影響評価、民間排出規制、脆弱なコミュニティ保護、世代間衡平を求められるようになったと分析する。政府の裁量はもはや無制限ではないと主張する。

English

This paper argues that climate change has shifted from environmental policy to a central issue of constitutional, administrative, and human rights law. Drawing on recent international climate jurisprudence, it analyzes how states are increasingly required to establish legally binding mitigation frameworks, measurable reduction pathways, climate impact assessments, regulation of private emissions, protection of vulnerable communities, and fair distribution of burdens across generations. It concludes that governmental discretion is no longer unlimited.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では、気候訴訟や憲法上の環境権の議論が活発化しており、本論文の分析は、今後の国内気候政策や訴訟リスクを考察する上で示唆に富む。特に、政府の削減目標の法的拘束力や、企業への規制強化の可能性を考える際に有用。

In the global GX context

Globally, this paper contributes to the growing scholarship on climate constitutionalism and state obligations, relevant to the implementation of the Paris Agreement and the rise of climate litigation. It provides a framework for understanding how courts and international bodies are shaping climate governance, which is pertinent for policymakers and legal scholars.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a comprehensive legal analysis of state obligations in climate governance, useful for scholars of climate law and policy.

🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into the evolving legal landscape that may affect corporate climate risk and disclosure obligations.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the legal requirements for states to establish binding mitigation frameworks, informing policy design.

📄 Abstract（原文）

Climate change has ceased to be merely an environmental policy concern and has become a central question of constitutional law, administrative law, human rights law and public accountability. Governments retain considerable discretion regarding the instruments through which climate objectives are pursued. Nevertheless, recent international and national jurisprudence demonstrates that such discretion is no longer unlimited. States are increasingly required to establish legally binding mitigation frameworks, formulate measurable reduction pathways, assess the climate consequences of public decisions, regulate private greenhouse gas emissions, protect vulnerable communities and distribute mitigation burdens fairly between present and future generations.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。