An Explainable q-Rung Orthopair Fuzzy Entropy-COPRAS Framework for Green Hydrogen Site Selection under Uncertainty

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

🔬研究者:Useful for those working on decision-making under uncertainty for hydrogen infrastructure planning, providing a transparent multi-criteria framework with sensitivity analysis.

🏢実務担当者:Site selection teams and hydrogen project developers can apply this framework to evaluate candidate sites systematically, balancing multiple conflicting criteria.

🏛政策担当者:Regulators and energy planners can use the framework to assess and prioritize hydrogen hub locations, integrating environmental and social factors with technical and economic criteria.

Green hydrogen site selection is a complex multi-criteria decision-making problem involving renewable-energy availability, water access, grid connectivity, industrial demand, land-use constraints, ecological risk, and social-permitting feasibility. Because these criteria are conflicting, heterogeneous, and often judged under uncertainty, this study proposes an explainable q-rung orthopair fuzzy Entropy-COPRAS framework for robust site evaluation. q-rung orthopair fuzzy sets are employed to represent positive, negative, and hesitant expert assessments within a flexible mathematical structure suitable for generalized uncertainty modelling. An entropy-based weighting procedure is developed to derive objective criterion weights from the dispersion of q-rung orthopair fuzzy score information, reflecting information-theoretic uncertainty. The COPRAS method is extended to rank candidate sites by separately considering benefit-type and cost-type criteria according to the complex proportional assessment principle. To improve transparency, the framework incorporates sensitivity analysis through q-parameter variation, weight perturbation, criterion ablation, and criterion-level contribution diagnosis. A reproducible benchmark with five candidate green hydrogen sites and seven criteria demonstrates the approach. Results show that the industrial port brownfield achieves the highest utility score, followed by the coastal renewable hub and inland solar belt. The framework supports transparent, interpretable, and sustainable hydrogen infrastructure planning under uncertain decision environments for planners, investors, regulators, and energy-system decision makers globally.  

• Zenodo https://zenodo.org/records/21444528first seen 2026-07-20 04:13:09