Beyond Dualism: <scp>EU</scp> Policy Toward Central Asia Through Decarbonization, Problem Linkage, and Civil Society Engagement
二元論を超えて：脱炭素、問題連携、市民社会の関与を通じたEUの中央アジア政策 (AI 翻訳)
Morena Skalamera
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、EUと中国の脱炭素アプローチがカザフスタンとウズベキスタンでどのように政策に反映されるかを分析する。構成主義的多層フレームワークを用い、現地の市民社会や制度がこれらの考えを取捨選択・再解釈することを示す。EUの効果は脱炭素を開発や社会的優先事項と結びつける問題連携にかかっていると主張する。
English
This article develops a constructivist multi-level framework to examine how EU and Chinese decarbonization approaches are translated into policy in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. It argues that local actors selectively appropriate these ideas, and EU effectiveness depends on linking decarbonization with developmental and social priorities (problem linkage).
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は中央アジアとのエネルギー協力を進める中、EUと中国の脱炭素政策競争の分析は参考になる。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to understanding how decarbonization is co-produced through interactions between external powers and local agency, relevant for climate diplomacy in developing resource-rich regions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a political economy framework for studying decarbonization as a contested and co-produced process.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of linking climate goals with local development priorities for effective decarbonization diplomacy.
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT Despite the large reappraisal of the EU's security and economic interests in Central Asia, its foreign policy impact has remained weak. This article develops a constructivist, multi‐level framework to examine how European and Chinese approaches to decarbonization are translated into policy in Kazakhstan and Uzbekistan. I argue that the EU and China advance fundamentally different conceptions of decarbonization, yet neither approach determines outcomes directly. Rather, domestic civil society organizations, policymakers, and local institutions selectively appropriate, reinterpret, and contest these competing ideas in light of local developmental priorities. The article advances the concept of problem linkage, arguing that the EU's effectiveness depends on its ability to connect decarbonization with broader developmental, distributional, and social priorities that matter to Central Asian governments and civil society, rather than treating climate action as a stand‐alone policy objective. By bringing everyday political economy into the study of climate diplomacy, the article demonstrates that decarbonization is not simply exported by major powers but co‐produced through interactions between their priorities and local agency.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70218first seen 2026-07-23 06:30:22
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。