民主主義と脱炭素化のジレンマ：気候市民会議は脱出口となり得るか？
The Democracy–Decarbonization Dilemma: Can Climate Assemblies Provide an Escape Route? (原題)
Fergus Green, Michele Zadra
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
パリ協定達成には急速な経済変革が必要だが、現代民主主義はこれに適さないとされる。専門機関への委任は権威主義ポピュリズムを招きかねず、民主的関与の深化が脱出口となり得る。本稿は民主的ミニ・パブリック（気候市民会議等）に関する理論・実証文献をレビューし、広範な市民の民主主義観や気候政策支持に一定の影響を与え得るが、それだけではジレンマ脱出に不十分と結論づける。DMPの制度化・拡大と補完的民主改革の必要性を提唱する。
English
Meeting the Paris Agreement requires rapid systemic transformation, yet contemporary democracies appear ill-suited to it. Delegating climate policy to expert bodies risks fueling authoritarian populism, so deepening democratic engagement—via climate assemblies and other democratic mini-publics (DMPs)—may offer an escape. Reviewing theoretical and empirical literature, the authors find DMPs can somewhat shift public attitudes toward democratic institutions and ambitious climate policy, but are unlikely alone to produce the widespread changes needed. They call for institutionalizing and expanding DMPs within deliberative systems alongside complementary democratic reforms.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では気候市民会議が自治体レベルで散発的に実施されており、脱炭素政策の合意形成や国民的対話の設計を考える上で参考になる。SSBJや有報開示とは直接関係しないが、政策の正統性確保という観点で企業のトランジション戦略の社会的受容を考える材料となる。
In the global GX context
As ISSB/CSRD disclosure regimes expand, the legitimacy of the policy processes driving decarbonization is increasingly contested. This paper speaks to the global debate on how democratic deliberation can sustain ambitious climate policy amid populist backlash, offering a conceptual bridge between disclosure-driven transition governance and participatory democracy.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:気候ガバナンスと民主的イノベーションの交差点における研究課題と方法論的限界を整理するのに有用。
🏢実務担当者:脱炭素戦略の社会的受容やステークホルダー対話の設計を考える際の背景理解に役立つ。
🏛政策担当者:気候市民会議の制度化や政策正統性確保の設計オプションを検討する際の参照点となる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Meeting the goals of the Paris Agreement on climate change demands rapid and systemic economic transformation. Yet, contemporary democracies seem tragically ill-suited to this task. Proposals to insulate climate policy making from democratic control—for instance, through delegation to expert bodies—seem likely to fuel the rise of authoritarian populists, which is already eroding democratic norms and institutions. Deepening democratic engagement with the process of decarbonization may provide an escape route from this apparent “democracy–decarbonization dilemma.” In this vein, there has recently been much enthusiasm for climate assemblies. Such processes can have profound effects on their participants. But can they influence attitudes to democracy and support for ambitious climate policy among the wider public? We conduct a narrative review of the theoretical and empirical literature on democratic mini-publics (DMPs) to answer this question and critically reflect on our findings. We find that DMPs can influence the wider public’s attitudes toward democratic institutions and public policy to some extent. Yet, DMPs alone—even if well publicized—seem unlikely to be sufficient to stimulate the widespread shifts in knowledge, capacities, attitudes and behavior necessary to escape the democracy–decarbonization dilemma. We propose expanding the use, institutionalization, and orientation of DMPs—so that they become a widely recognized and routinized feature of deliberative systems, interacting with both governments and the wider citizenry—while advancing complementary democratic reform initiatives.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- crossref https://doi.org/10.1017/s1537592726105921first seen 2026-09-22 05:45:05
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。