炭素回収・利用・貯留（CCUS）と石油増進回収（EOR）の統合：技術・経済・環境に関する包括的レビュー
Integration of Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) With Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR): A Comprehensive Technical, Economic, And Environmental Review (原題)
Hassan Babidi Yahya
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文はCCUSとEORの統合を技術・経済・環境の三面から包括的にレビューする。CO₂回収・輸送・圧入技術、増油収益とコスト構造、Weyburn-MidaleやPetra Nova等の事例を整理。貯留の永続性や漏洩リスク、LCA、気候目標への寄与も検討し、統合型CCUS-EORを産油国向けの移行経路として位置づける。
English
This review examines CCUS-EOR integration across technical, economic, and environmental dimensions. It covers CO2 capture, transport, and injection (with Niger Delta reservoirs), cost and revenue structures, and lessons from Weyburn-Midale, Petra Nova, and Sleipner. It assesses storage permanence, leakage, LCA, and climate-target contributions, positioning integrated CCUS-EOR as a transitional pathway for oil-producing nations.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はCCS/CCUSをGX推進の重点技術と位置づけ、JOGMECや先進的CCS事業が進行中。本レビューは統合型CCUS-EORの経済性・環境評価の枠組みを提供し、国内CCS事業の事業性評価や移行金融の議論に参照価値がある。
In the global GX context
As global disclosure frameworks (ISSB, CSRD) increasingly scrutinize transition plans and carbon-removal claims, this review's treatment of storage permanence, leakage, and LCA speaks directly to how CCUS-EOR can be credibly reported and financed. It adds a developing-economy perspective to a literature dominated by OECD cases.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:CCUS-EORの技術・経済・環境評価を統合的に整理した出発点として、LCAや貯留永続性の研究課題を把握できる。
🏢実務担当者:CCUS-EOR事業のコスト・収益構造とリスク要因を理解し、移行計画や投資判断の参考にできる。
🏛政策担当者:産油国におけるCCUS-EORの規制枠組みと気候目標への寄与を踏まえ、支援策設計の示唆を得られる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The dual challenge of meeting global energy demand and mitigating climate change has driven significant research into Carbon Capture, Utilization, and Storage (CCUS) technologies, with Enhanced Oil Recovery (EOR) serving as a key utilization pathway [1, 3]. This paper presents a comprehensive literature review of CCUS–EOR integration from technical, economic, and environmental perspectives. Technical discussions cover CO₂ capture methods, transport infrastructure, and injection mechanisms with a focus on Niger Delta reservoirs [11]. Economic analyses highlight cost components, revenue streams from incremental oil production, and lessons from global projects such as Weyburn-Midale, Petra Nova, and Sleipner [9, 14]. Environmental considerations examine CO₂ storage permanence, leakage risks, life-cycle assessments, and contribution to global climate targets [25, 35]. The review identifies limitations of stand-alone CCS projects and conventional EOR methods, emphasizing the novelty of integrated CCUS–EOR as a dual-purpose solution [28]. Emerging research trends—including low-cost capture technologies, advanced monitoring techniques, and supportive regulatory frameworks—are explored to support large-scale deployment in developing economies. The findings position CCUS–EOR as a transitional pathway for oil-producing nations like Nigeria, offering both extended hydrocarbon recovery and verifiable climate mitigation benefits [5].
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.56201/ijemt.vol.12.no3.2026.pg129.138first seen 2026-09-14 04:43:41
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。