Between Sustainable Development, Financialisation and Sovereign Debt Crisis: The Case of Blue Finance as Yet Another Iteration of the Washington Consensus
持続可能な開発、金融化、ソブリン債務危機の間で：ワシントン・コンセンサスのもう一つの反復としてのブルーファイナンスの事例 (AI 翻訳)
Leïla Choukroune
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は、ブルーファイナンスが世界銀行やIMF主導の新たなワシントン・コンセンサスの反復であると批判する。持続可能な開発、金融化、ソブリン債務危機の枠組みで分析し、グローバル・サウスへの影響を考察する。
English
This paper critiques Blue Finance as a new iteration of the Washington Consensus led by the World Bank and IMF. It analyzes its implications for sustainable development, financialisation, and sovereign debt crisis, with emphasis on the Global South.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のブルーエコノミー政策や海洋関連金融において、国際的な枠組みの批判的検討を提供する。直接的な開示基準への影響は薄いが、持続可能な金融の国際動向を理解する上で示唆がある。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a critical perspective on blue finance as a form of sustainable finance, relevant for global discussions on transition finance and the role of international institutions. It highlights risks of financialisation and debt for developing countries.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:国際経済法や開発金融の批判的視点からブルーファイナンスを再考する材料を提供する。
🏛政策担当者:持続可能な金融政策の策定において、ブルーファイナンスの潜在的リスクとガバナンス課題に留意すべきことを示す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
ABSTRACT As far as international economic law (IEL) is concerned, the ‘Washington Consensus’ generally refers to the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund (IMF)'s development finance policies and tools. It covers their application to their clients and borrowers with the support of Western governments. This acceptation is of particular interest to IEL scholars and practitioners alike for its recurrence questions the idea of a paradigm standing the test of time in offering multiple (re)incarnations of the same concept. Whilst there is not much binding law in development finance but rather various sets of voluntary guidelines and soft law principles, this form of regulation together with the study of institutional engagement and interactions between donors and receivers is of prime importance. Their evolutions on a recomposing global scene leaving more space for the Global South both as receiver and donor of aid and finance are of particular importance. In this regard, another incarnation of the ‘Washington Consensus’, largely initiated and guided by the same institutions and their regional counterparts, is appearing today with the concept of ‘Blue Finance’ as a new derivative of ‘Sustainable Finance’ or ‘Green finance’ designed to support the Blue Economy transition. In addressing the question of Blue Finance as a new iteration of the ‘Washington Consensus’, this article interrogates Blue Finance as Sustainable Finance (1) while later questioning the actors, rules, and beneficiaries of ‘financialisation’ (2) and reflecting upon the risk of sovereign debt spiralling (3). It concludes on the challenges posed by Blue Finance for the Global South notably considering its current approach to and practice of international economic law.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.1111/1758-5899.70119first seen 2026-05-14 21:28:36
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。