先進経済における排出量取引制度と産業炭素管理の比較分析
A Comparative Analysis of Emissions Trading Scheme and Industrial Carbon Management in Developed Economies. (原題)
Lt Col Prabhat K Prasad(Retd), Manish Gangil
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、ETS（排出量取引制度）とCCS・CDRといった産業炭素管理技術の統合のあり方を、先進国間で比較分析する。ETS枠組み内でのCCS/CDRの扱い、収入の技術支援への配分など5つの規制論点を検討。ネット排出削減と大気中CO2濃度低減に向けた制度設計の示唆を提示する。
English
This paper comparatively examines how developed economies integrate industrial carbon management (CCS, CDR) into emissions trading schemes. It analyzes five regulatory dimensions, including treatment of CCS/CDR within ETS frameworks and allocation of ETS revenues to support these technologies, offering design lessons for net emissions reduction.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本はGX-ETSの本格稼働とCCS事業化を進めており、ETSとCCS/CDRの制度接続はまさに政策課題。欧州等の先行事例は、炭素価格下でのCCS/CDRクレジット算定や収入配分の設計に直接参考となる。
In the global GX context
As jurisdictions worldwide (EU ETS, UK ETS, emerging Asian schemes) debate whether and how to credit CCS and CDR, this comparative work speaks directly to ISSB/TCFD-adjacent disclosure of removals and to transition-finance frameworks for carbon management infrastructure.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comparative regulatory framework for analyzing ETS–CCS/CDR integration across jurisdictions.
🏢実務担当者:Helps carbon management and compliance teams anticipate how CCS/CDR may be credited and financed under evolving ETS rules.
🏛政策担当者:Offers design considerations for treating CCS/CDR and allocating ETS revenues in emerging carbon markets like Japan's GX-ETS.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The integration of Industrial carbon management technologies, such as, carbon capture and storage (CCS) and carbon dioxide removal(CDR), within an emission trading scheme(ETS), offers a promising avenue for achieving net emissions reductions and lowering atmospheric concentrations of CO2, which is the major contributors to GHG emissions. In this paper, we explore how various jurisdictions have approached this relationship across five key regulatory considerations: the treatment of CCS and CDR activities within ETS frameworks, allocates ETS revenues to support CCS and CDR technologies. The recognition of different CO2 transport methods and the CO2 storage jurisdictions possibilities, are not within the purview of this paper.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://rsisinternational.org/journals/ijrias/uploads/vol11-iss9-pg822-835-202610_pdf.pdffirst seen 2026-10-14 05:30:57
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。