← 論文一覧に戻る

The Climate-Health Divide: How Climate Change Will Rewire Health Care Across High-, Middle-, and Low-Income Settings

気候と健康の格差:気候変動が高所得・中所得・低所得環境の医療をどう変えるか (AI 翻訳)

F. Epelde

International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-14#気候リスクOrigin: Global
DOI: 10.3390/ijerph23070902
原典: https://www.mdpi.com/1660-4601/23/7/902/pdf?version=1784020646
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、気候変動が医療システムに与える影響を、高所得国・中所得国・低所得国に分けて比較分析する。5つの経路(熱中症、感染症、食料・水の不安、精神的健康、医療インフラ)を通じて、気候リスクが医療需要・サービス中断・財政負担に不均等に変換される「気候-健康格差」の概念を提示する。脱炭素化と気候レジリエンスを統合的に設計する必要性を強調している。

English

This paper presents a structured narrative review comparing how climate change will transform health care across high-, middle-, and low-income settings. It introduces the concept of the 'climate-health divide'—the unequal conversion of shared climate hazards into clinical demand, service disruption, and financial stress. The review identifies five pathways and argues that climate resilience and healthcare decarbonization should be designed together.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本でも医療分野の脱炭素化(例:病院のエネルギー効率化、医療廃棄物削減)が議論され始めており、本稿の枠組みは日本の地域医療計画やBCP策定に示唆を与える。ただしSSBJや有報との直接的な関連は薄い。

In the global GX context

The paper is globally relevant as it links climate adaptation and decarbonization in the health sector, an area increasingly recognized in TCFD and ISSB frameworks for healthcare organizations. It provides a comparative lens for understanding differential climate risks across income settings.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a structured framework for cross-country analysis of climate-health impacts and adaptation priorities.

🏢実務担当者:Helps healthcare administrators anticipate climate-driven demand shifts and plan resilient, low-carbon operations.

🏛政策担当者:Offers evidence for integrated climate-health policy, highlighting the need to couple resilience with decarbonization.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Background: Climate change is increasingly recognised not only as an environmental emergency but also as a structural determinant of health and health-system performance. Its clinical consequences will not be distributed evenly: high-income countries face rising heat mortality, infrastructure fragility, ageing-related vulnerability, and the need to decarbonise technologically intensive care; middle- and low-income countries face heterogeneous but often more compressed combinations of heat, infectious disease, food insecurity, water stress, displacement, conflict-related fragility, and limited fiscal capacity. Objective: This structured narrative review proposes a comparative framework for understanding how climate change will transform health care across high-, middle-, and low-income settings and identifies adaptation priorities that are resilient, equitable, and low-carbon. Methods: We synthesised major climate-health assessments, peer-reviewed epidemiological studies, modelling papers, systematic and scoping reviews, and health-system decarbonisation literature identified through targeted searches and reference chaining. Five climate-health pathways, specified a priori from established direct, indirect, and socially mediated pathway frameworks, were used to organise the review. Findings: Climate change will reshape health care through five interacting pathways: direct thermal injury and extreme-weather mortality; altered infectious disease ecology; food, water, and nutritional insecurity; mental, maternal-child, and occupational impacts; and damage to the infrastructure, workforce, supply chains, finances, and emissions profile of health systems. In high-income countries, climate stress exposes the limits of hospital-centred, carbon-intensive, just-in-time care. In middle-income countries, expanding coverage and technology coexist with uneven insurance, large informal workforces, and rapidly growing emissions. In low-income and fragile settings, the same hazards interact with undernutrition, weak surveillance, under-resourced primary care, and constrained finance to produce larger marginal health losses. Conclusions: The central contribution is the concept of the climate-health divide: the unequal conversion of shared climate hazards into clinical demand, service disruption, financial stress, and emissions-intensive responses. Climate resilience and healthcare decarbonisation should therefore be designed together rather than treated as separate agendas.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。