気候変動緩和と災害リスク削減に向けたバイオ基盤アプローチと生態系基盤アプローチの比較
Comparing bio based and ecosystem based approaches for climate change mitigation and disaster risk reduction (原題)
Said Ahmed
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、バイオ基盤アプローチと生態系基盤アプローチを比較し、気候変動緩和と災害リスク削減への貢献を検討した。バイオ基盤は炭素隔離と生計便益が大きいが、土地競合や炭素永続性、単一栽培リスクなどのトレードオフを伴う。生態系基盤は生物多様性保全や洪水調整、沿岸保護など景観規模の便益が広い。両者の統合が相乗効果を高め、気候強靱な開発に寄与すると結論づける。
English
This review compares bio-based and ecosystem-based approaches for climate mitigation and disaster risk reduction, synthesizing 63 studies (2004-2026). Bio-based approaches offer strong carbon sequestration and livelihood benefits but face trade-offs like land competition and permanence risks. Ecosystem-based approaches deliver broader landscape-scale benefits including biodiversity, flood regulation, and coastal protection. Integrating both can enhance synergies and support climate-resilient development.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では生物多様性国家戦略やグリーンインフラ政策、企業のTNFD対応と関連する。自然基盤ソリューションの統合評価は、国内企業が気候・自然関連開示を進める上での参考になる。
In the global GX context
Globally, this review informs the growing integration of nature-based solutions into climate policy and corporate disclosure, particularly as TNFD and biodiversity frameworks gain traction alongside TCFD/ISSB. It highlights trade-offs relevant to carbon credit integrity and land-use governance debates.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:自然基盤ソリューションの統合評価枠組みとトレードオフ分析の整理として有用。
🏢実務担当者:自然関連開示やカーボンクレジット調達を検討する企業が、バイオ基盤と生態系基盤の便益とリスクを比較する際の参考になる。
🏛政策担当者:気候緩和と防災を統合した自然基盤政策の設計において、シナジーとトレードオフを考慮する必要性を示す。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate change is increasing the frequency and severity of extreme weather events, threatening ecosystems, livelihoods, and economic systems worldwide, particularly in developing countries. Nature-based approaches, especially bio-based and ecosystem-based strategies, have gained attention for their potential to support climate change mitigation and disaster risk reduction. This review provides a comparative analysis of these two approaches by synthesizing evidence from peer-reviewed literature and institutional reports published between 2004 and 2026. A semi-systematic review design was applied, covering 63 selected studies from major scientific databases and gray literature sources. Unlike previous reviews that examine bio-based and ecosystem-based approaches separately, this review provides a comparative assessment of their respective mitigation and disaster risk reduction capacities, identifies key trade-offs, and proposes integration pathways to maximize synergies for climate-resilient development. The findings indicate that bio-based approaches offer significant carbon sequestration potential and livelihood benefits, although they are constrained by trade-offs such as land competition, carbon permanence, and monoculture risks. Ecosystem-based approaches provide broader landscape-scale benefits, including carbon storage, biodiversity conservation, flood regulation, coastal protection, and enhanced resilience. The review highlights that integrating both approaches can enhance synergies, reduce trade-offs, and support sustainable and climate-resilient development pathways.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s43621-026-04559-xfirst seen 2026-09-27 04:35:11
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。