gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Replication Data for: Funding the Future: Understanding Public Spending Preferences on the Green Transition and Digitalization in Advanced Democracies

未来への資金調達：先進民主主義諸国におけるグリーン移行とデジタル化への公共支出選好の理解 (AI 翻訳)

Sophia Stutzmann, Sebastian Koos

Harvard Dataverseデータセット2026-04-28#政策Origin: Global
DOI: 10.7910/dvn/gymhw6
原典: https://doi.org/10.7910/dvn/gymhw6

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本研究は、グリーン移行とデジタル化という二つの社会的変革に対する市民の公共支出配分の選好を調査した。6カ国の比較調査データを用い、個人が自身の雇用に対する脅威と認識する変革への投資を減らす傾向があることを発見。両方の変革が脅威と認識される場合は、やや均等配分に傾く。

English

This study examines citizens' preferences for public spending allocation between the green and digital transitions using comparative survey data from six advanced democracies. It finds that individuals tend to reduce investment in the transition they perceive as a job threat, while cross-pressure from both threats shifts preferences slightly toward equal allocation.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本の文脈では、GX推進とデジタル化の双方に巨額投資が必要だが、国民の支持を得るためには雇用リスクへの懸念に配慮した政策設計が重要であることを示唆。

In the global GX context

Globally, this paper highlights a tension between the twin transitions and public opinion, offering insights for policymakers designing just transition strategies that account for labor market concerns.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on how perceived job risk from green and digital transitions shapes public spending preferences, contributing to political economy and transition studies.

🏢実務担当者:Useful for corporate and government communication teams to understand public concerns about dual transitions and calibrate messaging.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need to address job security concerns when designing green and digital investment packages to maintain public support.

📄 Abstract（原文）

The twin digital and green transition constitutes a major societal challenge in the upcoming decades. To remain competitive, governments need to invest in both transformations. However, budgetary limits constitute trade-offs in addressing both simultaneously. At the same time, both transformations have far-reaching consequences for labour markets. Yet, we know very little about citizens’ preferences for relative public spending on both transitions and their determinants. Here, we examine the role of subjective labour market risk resulting from these transitions in shaping relative spending preferences. We argue that individuals might prefer to spend less on the societal transformation they perceive as a job threat (single-pressuredness), while cross-pressuredness by both transitions leads to an equal split. Drawing on novel comparative survey data from six countries, we find that individuals prefer to divert investment from the transition they perceive as a threat to their jobs, while cross-pressuredness moves people slightly towards equal investment.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。