gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

Between Repurposing and Innovation: Governing the Resilience of Critical Offshore Energy Infrastructures in Italy

再利用と革新の間で:イタリアにおける重要洋上エネルギーインフラのレジリエンスを統治する (AI 翻訳)

Andrea Prontera, Claudio Christopher Passalacqua

Politics and Governance📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-24#エネルギー転換Origin: EU対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.17645/pag.12244
原典: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.12244
📄 PDF

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、低炭素移行における洋上エネルギーインフラのレジリエンスとセキュリティを分析する枠組みを提案し、イタリアの事例に適用する。公共主導と民間主導のガバナンス様式、脅威ベースとリスクベースの問題枠組みという二つの次元を組み合わせ、経路依存性がガバナンスの断片化を引き起こすことを示す。

English

This paper develops an analytical framework for critical offshore energy infrastructure governance during the low-carbon transition, combining modes of governance (public-led vs. private-led) and problem-framings (threat-based vs. risk-based). Applied to Italy, it finds increasing securitization and path-dependent fragmentation.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

イタリアの事例ではあるが、日本でも洋上風力発電の導入拡大に伴い、重要インフラのレジリエンスとセキュリティガバナンスが課題となる。本論文の枠組みは、日本の政策立案や官民連携の検討に示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global debates on governing critical energy infrastructure during the clean energy transition, highlighting trade-offs between securitization and resilience. Its framework is applicable to other countries expanding offshore wind.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a novel analytical framework combining governance modes and problem-framings for studying critical infrastructure resilience.

🏢実務担当者:Insights on how public-led governance and threat-based approaches shape risk management for offshore energy operators.

🏛政策担当者:Highlights path dependency risks and the need for coherent governance frameworks to avoid fragmentation.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Offshore energy infrastructures are becoming increasingly central to the low-carbon transition while raising pressing questions of resilience and security. Assets such as offshore wind installations, subsea electricity cables, and pipelines are exposed to a growing range of environmental, technological, and geopolitical risks, as well as cyber and physical threats. This article develops an analytical framework for the study of critical offshore energy infrastructure governance, combining two dimensions: modes of governance, ranging from public-led to private-led arrangements, and problem-framings, spanning threat-based and risk-based approaches. The framework is applied to the Italian case to trace recent institutional and policy developments in critical offshore energy infrastructure governance. Findings reveal an increasing securitisation of offshore energy infrastructures and a shift towards more public-led and threat-based approaches, alongside the consolidation of risk-based instruments focused on resilience and coordination with private operators. The article argues that these dynamics are shaped by path dependence: While the repurposing of existing institutional capacities enables rapid responses in an emerging policy field, it also contributes to fragmented governance arrangements and constrains the development of a more coherent framework. More broadly, the study highlights how competing governance modes and problem-framings shape critical infrastructure governance during the low-carbon transition.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。