← 論文一覧に戻る

Optimal Carbon Pricing Considering Human Health Benefits from the Reduction in Air Pollutant Emissions in Urban Energy Systems

都市エネルギーシステムにおける大気汚染排出削減の健康便益を考慮した最適カーボンプライシング (AI 翻訳)

Aliakbar Rezazadeh, Akram Avami

DOAJ (DOAJ: Directory of Open Access Journals)📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2025-09-01#炭素価格対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.22059/jes.2025.395024.1008607
原典: https://doaj.org/article/97d4285c7ca64b0d916ebc180398619d

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

炭素価格設定に健康コベネフィットを組み込んだ二段階統合評価モデルを提案。都市エネルギーシステムを対象に、SSP/RCPシナリオと地域気候モデルを用い、温室効果ガス排出ペナルティ(炭素価格)を最適化。結果として、1tCO2eqあたり3.3〜7.9ドルの炭素価格が導出され、大気汚染削減による健康便益の考慮が重要と示した。

English

This study develops a bi-level integrated assessment model for optimal carbon pricing that internalizes human health costs from air pollution and climate change in urban energy systems. Using SSP/RCP scenarios and a regional climate model, it finds carbon prices of $3.3–$7.9 per tCO2eq, demonstrating the importance of co-benefits for efficient climate policy.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではカーボンプライシング(GXリーグ/排出量取引)が導入段階にあり、本モデルのように健康便益を内部化した価格設定は、国内の炭素価格設計や費用対効果分析に示唆を与える。ただし、本研究はイラン都市部を対象としており、日本の制度・データにそのまま適用するには調整が必要。

In the global GX context

This paper offers a replicable framework for jurisdictions designing carbon pricing with co-benefit accounting, linking energy system optimization to health outcome internalization. It is particularly relevant for global debates on carbon price floors and the social cost of carbon, though the case study is Iran-specific.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Integrated assessment modeling and carbon pricing design researchers can draw on the bi-level optimization approach and the explicit handling of health co-benefits.

🏢実務担当者:Corporate sustainability teams can use the carbon price range as a signal for long-term carbon cost projections, but the model itself is policy-oriented.

🏛政策担当者:Policymakers designing carbon pricing mechanisms can learn from this framework to internalize air pollution health externalities and calibrate price levels.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Objective: Carbon pricing is a critical tool for achieving environmental objectives while maintaining economic equilibrium, yet determining an optimal carbon price remains a complex challenge. Carbon pricing not only influences the optimal conditions and the technological composition of the energy system but also leads to new emission patterns. The energy system has a lot of external costs, including social, health, ecosystem damage, and resource depletion. It is essential to set taxes in a way that minimizes market disruptions while internalizing externalities. Greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions Penalty (GP) cannot only reduce health costs due to global warming but also, through a co-benefit approach, reduce health costs associated with air pollution. Thus, this study estimates the level of GP with the aim of internalizing the human health costs of global warming and air pollution. The structure of the energy system significantly affects carbon emissions and pricing, necessitating an integrated modeling approach. Method: This study developed a novel bi-level integrated assessment model of emission-health-energy, where the lower level optimizes the energy system and the upper level optimizes the carbon price. The Shared Socioeconomic Pathways (SSP) scenarios depict the socioeconomic status, while the Representative Concentration Pathways (RCP) scenarios represent the climatic conditions. Based on the RCP scenarios, General Circulation Models (GCMs) are applied to determine the climate condition. A data-driven Regional Climate Model (RCM) is developed to estimate climate conditions in the study area. At the upper level, the objective function seeks to minimize the GP annually. In the GP approach, the price should compensate for the health costs stemming from climate change and air pollution. This approach emphasizes that GP has the capacity to offset the damages caused by air pollution, effectively demonstrating a co-benefit between carbon emissions and air pollution in policy-making. In this approach, the discounted GHG emission penalty in each year is equal to discounted health costs. In the first step, the more complex lower-level model was developed. After running the integrated energy-health-emission model at the lower level, the outputs were compared to verify whether the discounted health costs match the discounted GHG emission penalty. If this condition was not satisfied, the GP would be adjusted; otherwise, the optimal pathway for the energy supply chain and the optimal GP were determined. Results: This model was applied to four scenarios within a case study. The model revealed carbon prices ranging from $3.3 to $7.9 per tCO2eq, varying across years and scenarios. The results demonstrated the importance of considering economic benefits in carbon pricing, highlighting significant differences compared to previous studies. Conclusions: The proposed model provides a robust tool for policymakers to align carbon pricing with environmental and climate policy while maintaining economic stability. By linking energy system optimization, health cost internalization, and climate policy, this framework designs efficient carbon policies. Future research could expand its applicability to other regions and externalities, further refining the balance between sustainability and economic growth.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。