Baseline Setting and Carbon Credit Quantification in Improved Forest Management: A Demonstrative Case Study
改良された森林管理におけるベースライン設定と炭素クレジットの定量化：実証ケーススタディ (AI 翻訳)
Ábel Borovics, Attila Benke, Attila Borovics, Éva Király, Endré Schiberna
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、EUの炭素除去認証枠組み（CRCF）に準拠した改良森林管理（IFM）の実証ケースを示す。ハンガリー西部の4.7ヘクタールのスコットランドパイン・シデ林を対象に、延伸伐期と気候適応型更新を組み合わせ、ベースラインを国家森林データベースから設定し、炭素蓄積をForest Industry Carbon Modelでモデル化した。2024～2055年の期間に、総バイオマス炭素は99 tC増加し、更新によりさらに44 tCが追加された。ベースライン吸収と実施に伴う排出を差し引いた後、201の炭素クレジットが生成され、現在価値で7,255ユーロに相当する。CRCFに沿ったIFM評価の実践方法と経済的実行可能性を示している。
English
This paper presents a demonstrative case of Improved Forest Management (IFM) under the EU's Carbon Removal Certification Framework (CRCF). Using a 4.7-hectare Scots pine–hornbeam stand in Western Hungary, the study combines extended rotation with climate-adaptive regeneration. A hypothetical baseline is derived from national forestry data, and carbon sequestration is modeled with a 15% uncertainty correction. From 2024-2055, total biomass carbon increases by 99 tC, with regeneration adding 44 tC. After deducting baseline and minor emissions, 201 credits are generated, worth EUR 10,074 (PV EUR 7,255). The study illustrates practical CRCF-aligned IFM assessment, emphasizing baseline definitions, net-positive carbon balance, and economic viability.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
本論文はEUのCRCFに基づく炭素クレジットの実践を示しており、日本でもJ-クレジット制度や森林吸収源対策の参考となる。特にベースライン設定や追加性の評価方法は、日本の森林管理プロジェクトにおけるクレジット認証に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a practical demonstration of carbon credit quantification under the EU's CRCF, directly relevant to global carbon removal certification efforts. It highlights methodological challenges in baseline setting and additionality, offering insights for policymakers and practitioners developing similar frameworks (e.g., ISSB, SEC climate rules).
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Methodology for carbon accounting in forest management, including baseline setting and uncertainty correction.
🏢実務担当者:Practical steps for developing IFM carbon credit projects under the EU CRCF, including economic viability assessment.
🏛政策担当者:Insights for designing carbon removal certification standards, particularly baseline definition and additionality testing.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Improved Forest Management (IFM) is expected to become a key component of the EU’s Carbon Removal Certification Framework (CRCF), yet baseline setting, additionality assessment, and carbon-removal quantification remain methodologically challenging. This study presents a demonstrative IFM case using a 4.7-hectare Scots pine–hornbeam stand in Western Hungary, combining extended rotation with climate-adaptive regeneration. A hypothetical baseline was derived from National Forestry Database data, while carbon sequestration was modelled using the Forest Industry Carbon Model with a 15% uncertainty correction. Project-related emissions were quantified under the IPCC guidelines. Over 2024–2055, total biomass carbon increased by 99 tC, with regeneration contributing an additional 44 tC. After deducting baseline sequestration and minor implementation emissions (<1% of total removals), the project generates 201 eligible carbon credits, equivalent to 10,074 EUR (7,255 EUR at present value). The case study illustrates how CRCF-aligned IFM assessments can be conducted in practice, stressing the importance of baseline definitions, the strong net-positive carbon balance of IFM measures, and the potential economic viability of such projects under forthcoming EU carbon removal standards.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.37045/aslh-2026-0003first seen 2026-06-17 05:39:24 · last seen 2026-06-17 07:13:58
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。