比較エネルギー正義研究：実証的研究アジェンダに向けて
Comparative energy justice scholarship: Toward an empirical research agenda (原題)
Kathleen J. Hancock, Kathryn Chelminski, Christina E. Hoicka, Suyash Jolly, Frank N. Laird, Alexandra Mallett
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
化石燃料からクリーンエネルギーへの移行を北米・中南米・欧州・アジアの民主主義国で実証研究してきた知見を基に、比較エネルギー正義の研究アジェンダを提唱する論文。連邦制・公益事業委員会・先住民統治といった政治制度と、EUのローカルアクショングループ、社会正義団体、企業・保守派、宗教団体、労働者という5種の過小研究アクターに着目する。理論枠組みではなく現場で誰が正義をどう経験・主張するかの質的比較分析を促す。
English
Drawing on empirical energy-transition research across democracies in the Americas, Europe, and Asia, the authors propose a comparative energy justice research agenda. They highlight under-explored institutions (federalism, public utility commissions, Indigenous governance) and five under-researched actor groups, from EU Local Action Groups to workers and conservatives. The agenda prioritizes in-depth qualitative study of how justice is experienced and advocated on the ground.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX推進では地域合意形成や公正な移行（脱炭素電源立地・雇用転換）が課題であり、制度・アクター比較の視点は国内の移行政策設計やステークホルダー対話に示唆を与える。開示実務への直接接続は弱い。
In the global GX context
As ISSB/CSRD disclosure expands, the 'S' and just-transition dimensions increasingly require evidence on how communities and workers experience transition. This agenda offers a comparative qualitative framework that complements quantitative transition-finance and disclosure metrics.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:比較事例・質的手法でエネルギー正義の実証研究を設計する際の制度・アクター整理の枠組みとして有用。
🏢実務担当者:移行プロジェクトの地域・労働者ステークホルダー対応や公正な移行の説明責任を検討する際の視点を提供。
🏛政策担当者:連邦制・規制委員会・先住民統治など制度設計と、過小代表アクターの包摂を移行政策に組み込む示唆。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Drawing on our collective experiences conducting empirical research on the energy transition from fossil fuels to clean energy in select democracies in North America, Latin America, Europe, and Asia, we propose a rich empirical approach that focuses on in-depth qualitative analysis to create a Comparative Energy Justice research agenda. The energy transition makes room for a more as well as less just system to emerge. Focusing on the energy transition rather than the broader category of energy allows us to center this interaction and provide insights for those advocating for greater energy justice. Each section summarizes findings and concludes with suggestions for comparative research. We first discuss political institutional structures related to energy policy that have been under-explored in energy justice research, notably federalism, public utility commissions, and Indigenous Nations governance. Next, we elaborate five categories of under-researched actors in the energy transition: the European Union's Local Action Groups, social justice organizations, businesses and political conservatives, faith-based organizations, and workers in the energy transition. Research should explore how these actors have interacted and will interact in the future with older coalition members who might have different experiences and world views. Moving beyond extant research that focuses on concepts and theoretical framing, our research agenda seeks to understand what is happening on the ground, for key constituencies including workers, advocates, policymakers, and citizens. We are ultimately concerned with understanding how groups and individuals experience and advocate for justice in the energy transition as well as the potential pitfalls of broadening pro-renewable energy coalitions that might split over justice issues. Our focus on under-explored institutions and actors in the overlapping space of the energy transition, energy justice, and comparative research is a novel approach.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2026.105018first seen 2026-10-25 04:38:07 · last seen 2026-11-04 04:38:32
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。