gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

The Great Green Heist: Narratives and Realities Shaping Africa’s Climate Actions

グレート・グリーン・ハイスト:アフリカの気候行動を形成する物語と現実 (AI 翻訳)

M. N. Pius, Ejeh Lawrence Udeh, Mbaya Yusuf Arhyel, Nnah Haruna Pius

Journal of Global Ecology and Environment📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-05-16#気候金融Origin: Global
DOI: 10.56557/jogee/2026/v22i210598
原典: https://doi.org/10.56557/jogee/2026/v22i210598

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、地球規模の気候ガバナンスが新植民地主義の道具として機能し、アフリカを炭素オフセット地帯としていると批判する。気候資金の不均衡、データ植民地主義、資源搾取を実証的に示し、気候主権の回復を提案する。

English

This paper critiques global climate governance as a tool of neo-colonialism, positioning Africa as a carbon offset zone. It provides empirical evidence of unequal climate finance, data colonialism, and resource exploitation, and proposes a strategic approach for climate sovereignty.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

In the global GX context

This paper offers a critical perspective on carbon markets and climate finance, highlighting risks of perpetuating dependency. It is relevant for global GX discussions on equity, sovereignty, and the design of transition finance mechanisms.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Contributes to decolonial climate scholarship and critiques carbon colonialism in global governance.

🏛政策担当者:Advises on avoiding neo-colonial dynamics in climate finance and prioritizing African sovereignty in climate negotiations.

📄 Abstract(原文)

Global climate discourse often functions as a tool of neo-colonial dominance, positioning Africa as both a resource base and a carbon offset zone for the Global North. Whether described as a victim in need of salvation or a climate asset to be managed, the continent is framed, used, and silenced through narratives engineered to serve external interests. This curated vulnerability sustains financial dependency, policy manipulation, and data colonialism, obscuring Africa’s inherent resilience, leadership potential, and historical agency. This paper examines the global climate governance system and its uneven socio-economic impact on Africa. Although Africa contributes less than four percent of global greenhouse gas emissions, it suffers a disproportionate share of climate-related damages, framed by external narratives of vulnerability, dependence, and fragility. By combining empirical data, policy review, and historical analysis, the study exposes how climate discourse, financial flows, and market tools, such as REDD+, carbon offset markets, and critical mineral extraction, serve to maintain structural dependency, resource exploitation, and erosion of sovereignty. The analysis highlights processes of “carbon colonialism” and “climate wealth drain,” where Africa’s forests, minerals, data, and policy space are commoditized under the pretence of sustainability. Quantitative evidence reveals stark imbalances: climate finance covers less than a quarter of the continent’s adaptation needs, illicit financial outflows surpass aid and investment inflows, and climate-related debt deepens fiscal fragility. The paper argues that beyond climate change itself, Africa’s primary challenge lies in the entrenched geopolitical and economic systems that leverage the climate agenda to reinforce external dominance. In response, it proposes a strategic approach to climate sovereignty focused on debt relief, resource value addition, data control, industrial development, and collective diplomacy. The study frames Africa’s natural wealth and demographic strength as key levers to reshape global climate relations, moving from a passive provider of undervalued carbon and raw materials to an empowered green leader. This work adds to decolonial climate scholarship and offers practical pathways for Africa to reclaim its agency in the climate era.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。