Emission reduction decision under carbon quota competition versus cooperation trade mode of dual supply chain based on two allocation mechanisms
二つの配分メカニズムに基づくデュアルサプライチェーンにおける炭素クォータ競争対協調取引モード下の排出削減意思決定 (AI 翻訳)
Zhongrui Wang, Qinghua Wu
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、グランドファーザリングとベンチマーキングの2つの初期炭素クォータ配分メカニズムを比較し、シングルおよびデュアルサプライチェーンモデルを用いて競争的・協力的な炭素取引モードを分析する。ベンチマーキングは適切なクォータ範囲内で排出削減と生産効率において優れており、政府は適切な初期クォータ設定が重要であることを示す。
English
This study compares grandfathering and benchmarking carbon quota allocation mechanisms, analyzing competitive and cooperative carbon trading modes in single and dual supply chain models. Findings show benchmarking outperforms in emission reduction and production efficiency within a defined quota range, and government must set quotas appropriately.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、今後導入が検討されるカーボンプライシング（排出量取引制度）の設計において、初期配分方式（グランドファーザリング vs ベンチマーキング）の選択が企業行動やサプライチェーン間の協調に与える影響を理論的に示しており、政策立案や企業の戦略立案に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global carbon pricing design by modeling how allocation mechanisms (grandfathering vs benchmarking) affect supply chain emission reduction and cooperation. It provides insights for policymakers designing Emissions Trading Systems (ETS) and for firms managing cross-chain carbon strategies.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a theoretical framework linking allocation mechanisms and supply chain dynamics, useful for extending to empirical or policy simulation studies.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights for corporate supply chain managers on optimal emission reduction strategies under different carbon quota regimes and trading modes.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of selecting appropriate allocation mechanisms and quota ranges to balance emission reduction with economic efficiency.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Under different initial carbon quota allocation mechanisms, firms adopt distinct emission reduction and production strategies, leading to varied carbon trading patterns. This study examines two prevalent allocation mechanisms (grandfathering and benchmarking) and develops single- and dual-supply chain models to analyse competitive versus cooperative carbon trading modes. In the single-chain model, we analyse the influence of carbon trading prices on emission reduction and derive the upper and lower thresholds of initial carbon quotas for each mechanism. Extending to the dual-chain model, we compare competition and cooperation modes, proposing a synergistic effect between allocation mechanisms and carbon trading. Research findings demonstrate that the benchmarking mechanism consistently outperforms grandfathering in both emission reduction and production efficiency, provided the initial carbon quota falls within a defined range. Under the same allocation mechanism, the supply chain prioritises monopolising consumer markets; however, cooperation becomes optimal if a carbon quota surplus exists between dual chains. Furthermore, government allocation policy must set initial quotas within an appropriate range to achieve better emission reduction.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2025.2610456first seen 2026-05-15 17:18:46
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。