気候変動訴訟と環境正義：現代の法的視座
Climate Change Litigation and Environmental Justice: Contemporary Legal Perspectives (原題)
(著者不明)
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、気候変動訴訟と環境正義の関係を、インド・米国・EU・豪州などの最近の司法動向の比較法分析を通じて検討する。憲法規定・制定法・国際協定・人権原則を援用した司法の革新と、執行・企業責任・適応・司法アクセスをめぐる課題を整理する。実効的な気候ガバナンスには強固な法枠組みと司法の積極的関与、国際協力が不可欠と結論づける。
English
This paper comparatively examines how climate change litigation and environmental justice intersect across India, the US, the EU, Australia and beyond. It maps judicial innovations invoking constitutional, statutory, treaty and human-rights principles, and flags challenges in enforcement, corporate accountability, adaptation and access to justice. It concludes that effective climate governance requires robust legal frameworks, proactive courts and international cooperation.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では気候訴訟はまだ限定的だが、有報・統合報告書での気候関連リスク開示やSSBJ対応が進む中、企業の法的責任リスクを理解する上で参考になる。環境正義の視点は、地域住民・サプライチェーンをめぐる訴訟リスク管理に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, this sits alongside the surge of climate litigation (e.g. Urgenda, Milieudefensie, youth-led cases) that increasingly interacts with TCFD/ISSB disclosure duties and corporate transition planning. It adds a comparative, environmental-justice lens to disclosure scholarship by linking legal accountability to equity concerns.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:比較法・環境正義の枠組みを、気候ガバナンスと司法の役割の観点から整理する研究に有用。
🏢実務担当者:気候関連訴訟リスクと企業説明責任の潮流を把握し、開示・適応戦略の法的リスク評価に活用できる。
🏛政策担当者:司法アクセスや執行メカニズムの設計、国際協調の必要性を検討する際の比較法的参照となる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Climate change has emerged as one of the most pressing global challenges of the twenty-first century, posing significant threats to ecosystems, human rights, public health, economic development, and sustainable governance. As the adverse impacts of climate change intensify, litigation has become an increasingly important legal mechanism for enforcing environmental obligations, holding governments and corporations accountable, and protecting the rights of vulnerable communities. Climate change litigation has expanded rapidly across jurisdictions, addressing issues such as greenhouse gas emissions, environmental degradation, biodiversity conservation, adaptation measures, corporate responsibility, and intergenerational equity. Simultaneously, the concept of environmental justice has gained prominence by emphasizing the equitable distribution of environmental benefits and burdens, ensuring that marginalized and disadvantaged communities are not disproportionately affected by environmental harm. Contemporary legal systems increasingly recognize the close relationship between climate justice, constitutional rights, and international environmental obligations. Courts across various countries have relied upon constitutional provisions, statutory frameworks, international agreements, and human rights principles to strengthen environmental governance and promote sustainable development. This paper critically examines the evolving relationship between climate change litigation and environmental justice through a comparative legal analysis of recent judicial developments in India, the United States, the European Union, Australia, and other jurisdictions. It explores emerging legal principles, judicial innovations, and policy responses while highlighting challenges relating to enforcement, corporate accountability, climate adaptation, and access to justice. The study concludes that effective climate governance requires robust legal frameworks, proactive judicial intervention, international cooperation, and inclusive environmental policies capable of ensuring ecological sustainability, social equity, and long-term protection of present and future generations.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.66572/ijlscl.2026.v1.i12.35954first seen 2026-09-20 04:33:47
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。