Circular economy and input–output impacts of phasing out the coal sector in Muğla, Türkiye: a regional just transition perspective
トルコ・ムーラ県における石炭セクター段階的廃止の循環経済と産業連関影響：地域的公正な移行の視点から (AI 翻訳)
Simay Kızılkaya, Sevil Acar, Bengisu Özenç
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究はトルコ・ムーラ県の石炭セクター段階的廃止と補助金の廃止が地域経済（産出、付加価値、雇用）と温室効果ガス排出に与える影響を産業連関分析で評価。さらに、補助金を公正な移行基金として再配分し、グリーンエネルギーや循環経済への投資シナリオを比較。結果は地域の脱炭素化と経済成長のバランスに示唆を与える。
English
This study evaluates the economic and environmental impacts of phasing out coal subsidies in Muğla, Türkiye, using input-output analysis. It compares direct removal with three alternative scenarios reallocating funds to green energy, circular economy, and low-carbon sectors. Findings inform regional just transition strategies balancing economic growth and climate goals.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では石炭火力のフェードアウトが議論されているが、地域経済への影響分析は限定的。本手法は日本の地方自治体や地域産業政策にも応用可能な枠組みを提供する。
In the global GX context
This paper presents a regional input-output analysis of coal phase-out with a just transition lens, offering a replicable methodology for assessing subsidy reform and green investment reallocation. It contributes to global scholarship on equitable decarbonization and circular economy transitions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a regional input-output framework for evaluating just transition policies, useful for comparative studies.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights on reallocating coal subsidies to circular economy investments for regional sustainability teams.
🏛政策担当者:Demonstrates trade-offs of coal subsidy reform and fund reallocation, relevant for designing equitable decarbonization strategies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study evaluates the economic and environmental implications of phasing out the coal sector and discontinuing subsidies for both coal mines and coal-fired power plants in Muğla, Türkiye, with a focus on key metrics such as output, value-added, employment, and greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions. The analysis proceeds in two distinct phases. Initially, it explores the direct effects of removing investment incentives for coal mining and capacity payments to thermal power plants within the electricity market capacity mechanism on regional economic indicators and environmental outcomes. Subsequently, it examines three alternative scenarios wherein these subsidies are used as a just transition fund and redirected towards greener energy technologies, investments in the circular economy within selected industries, and lower-carbon sectors in the regional context. This two-pronged approach facilitates a comparative evaluation of the costs and benefits of subsidy reform from the perspective of a just transition. The findings aim to guide regional development strategies that balance economic growth with climate mitigation objectives. By elucidating the distributional and environmental trade-offs associated with coal subsidy removal and the reallocation of funds towards sustainable investments, the study provides valuable insights for designing policies that support equitable decarbonization and promote circular economies at the local level.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3389/frsus.2026.1811466first seen 2026-06-04 04:36:35
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。