Governance Reform for Geothermal Power Expansion in the Context of a Just Energy Transition Framework
地熱発電拡大のためのガバナンス改革：公正なエネルギー転換の枠組みの文脈で (AI 翻訳)
Shalomita Trifosa, Ida Nurlinda, Nadia Astriani
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
インドネシアのウルンブ地熱発電所拡大計画は先住民族コミュニティの抵抗を引き起こし、エネルギー転換と地域社会の権利保護の間に緊張があることを示す。本研究は、認識、手続き、分配の正義の3次元から規制を分析し、慣習的土地の特定不足、自由で事前の情報に基づく同意（FPIC）の不備、監視の弱さといった3つの基本的な弱点を明らかにした。結論として、現在の再生可能エネルギー促進政策は許認可を重視し、地域パートナーシップを軽視しており、ガバナンス改革が必要であると提言する。
English
The expansion of the Ulumbu Geothermal Power Plant in Indonesia faces resistance from indigenous communities, highlighting tensions between clean energy goals and local rights. Analyzing regulations through recognition, procedural, and distributive justice dimensions, this study finds three critical gaps: lack of customary land identification, absence of explicit FPIC requirements, and weak oversight. The paper argues that current renewable energy policies prioritize permits over local partnerships, calling for governance reforms such as pre-licensing land surveys and codified consent standards.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX政策では、地熱発電も重要な再生可能エネルギー源だが、国内では温泉業者との調整や国立公園問題など類似のコンフリクトが存在する。本研究の分析枠組みは、日本の地熱開発における地域社会との合意形成や手続き的正義の確保にも示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to the global discourse on just energy transitions by providing a regulatory critique of geothermal expansion in Indonesia. It offers a framework for evaluating justice dimensions (recognition, procedural, distributive) that can be applied to other developing countries pursuing renewable energy, and highlights the risk of perpetuating extractive patterns if governance reforms are neglected.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a just transition evaluation framework for energy governance, useful for scholars studying regulatory gaps in renewable energy development.
🏛政策担当者:Recommends concrete governance reforms: mandatory pre-licensing customary land identification, codification of FPIC, and stronger regulatory institutions.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The Ulumbu Geothermal Power Plant (GPP) expansion project in Poco Leok is sparking resistance from indigenous communities, reflecting the broader agrarian conflict in Indonesian energy transition landscape. This tension exposes a significant gap between clean energy ambitions and the protection of local community rights. Purpose: This study aims to analyze the inconsistencies of the agrarian regulatory framework in geothermal energy development against the principles of a just energy transition. Methods: In order to achieve the stated objective, a juridical-normative method was adopted, drawing on legislative and conceptual approaches. Accordingly, relevant regulations were examined through three dimensions of justice, namely recognition justice, procedural justice, and distributive justice. Results: The analysis uncovers three fundamental weaknesses. First, existing regulations do not guarantee certainty regarding the subjects and objects of customary land prior to land acquisition, constituting a recognition crisis. Second, there are no explicit regulations governing the implementation of Free, Prior, and Informed Consent (FPIC) and transparency standards, reflecting a procedural crisis. Third, weak oversight triggers an unequal distribution of ecological risks for communities, amounting to a distributive crisis. The analysis also showed that current renewable energy acceleration policies tend to focus on facilitating permits rather than strengthening local partnerships. Conclusion: The current renewable energy regulatory framework has the potential to reproduce extractive development patterns that deepen agrarian and social inequalities in the region. Suggestion: Governance reform is needed through mandatory pre-licensing customary land identification, normative codification of FPIC, and the strengthening of geothermal sector regulatory institutions. Contribution: This study enriches energy and agrarian law scholarship by integrating a just transition perspective as an evaluative framework for regulations in Indonesia.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.25134/unifikasi.v13i01.1251first seen 2026-07-28 04:56:16
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。