Energy Transition and Governance: A Systematic Literature Review
エネルギー移行とガバナンス：系統的文献レビュー (AI 翻訳)
A. Faridzad, C. H. Sim, Jacqueline Chang Siak Gek, Kingsley Hung Khai Yeo
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
この系統的文献レビューは、エネルギー移行とガバナンスに関する既存研究を統合し、資金調達、政策、技術の3つの領域に整理した。政策の一貫性や公正な枠組みの不足を指摘し、学際的なアプローチの必要性を強調している。
English
This systematic literature review synthesizes research on energy transition governance, categorizing findings into financing, policy, and technology domains. It highlights gaps in policy coherence and justice frameworks, calling for interdisciplinary approaches.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、GX実現に向けた政策と技術の統合が課題となっている。本レビューは、日本が進めるグリーントランスフォーメーション（GX）政策の枠組み設計に示唆を与える可能性がある。
In the global GX context
This review provides a comprehensive overview of governance challenges in energy transition, relevant for global policymakers designing integrated frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured overview of fragmented literature, useful for identifying research gaps.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into financial and policy dimensions for corporate energy transition strategies.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for coherent governance and equity in transition policies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The global shift toward a low-carbon economy has intensified scholarly and political attention on the governance of energy transition, which is critical for ensuring equitable, efficient, and sustainable outcomes. Despite the rapid expansion of research in this field, existing studies remain fragmented, with varying emphases on financial, policy, and technological dimensions, limiting the ability to form integrated governance frameworks. This systematic literature review addresses this gap by synthesizing current knowledge on “Energy Transition and Governance” through a rigorous search and selection process. Advanced database searches were conducted in Scopus and Web of Science, applying predefined inclusion and exclusion criteria to ensure relevance, quality, and novelty. From an initial pool of studies, 25 primary articles were identified for in-depth analysis. The findings were thematically organized into three core domains: (1) Financing, Economic Drivers, and Market Risks in Energy Transition, which explores investment flows, risk mitigation strategies, and the role of economic incentives; (2) Governance, Policy, and Justice in Energy Transition, which examines institutional frameworks, regulatory effectiveness, and equity considerations; and (3) Technological Innovation, ESG, and Data-Driven Solutions, which highlights the integration of emerging technologies, environmental, social, and governance (ESG) practices, and data analytics in accelerating transition goals. The review reveals that while financing mechanisms and technological advances are well-documented, policy coherence, cross-sectoral governance, and equitable justice frameworks remain underdeveloped. This underscores the need for future research to adopt interdisciplinary approaches, bridge policy–technology gaps and enhance governance models that align financial incentives with social equity and environmental integrity. By consolidating evidence across diverse perspectives, this study provides a comprehensive foundation for policymakers, industry leaders, and researchers seeking to design effective governance systems for a just and sustainable energy transition.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.37934/progee.32.1.1029first seen 2026-05-15 21:36:55
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。