← 論文一覧に戻る

炭素市場政策が駆動するCCS-EOR技術普及の動的メカニズム:進化ゲーム分析と炭素価格閾値研究

Dynamic Mechanisms of CCS-EOR Technology Diffusion Driven by Carbon Market Policies: An Evolutionary Game Analysis and Carbon Price Threshold Study (原題)

Junli Zhang, Chuanwang Liu, Yalin Lei, Yong Zhou Jiang

Energies📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-11-06#炭素価格Origin: CN経営インパクト: コスト削減対象セクター: power
DOI: 10.3390/en19215325
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/en19215325

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

炭素市場政策がCCS-EOR技術の普及に与える影響を、交互オファー交渉モデルと2集団進化ゲームの統合モデルで分析した研究。中国のCCS-EORプロジェクトに基づく4シナリオで、低・高回収コスト時の臨界炭素価格が64.9および110.0 USD/tCO2であることを示す。炭素価格は交渉されたCO2取引価格を通じて利用企業に間接的に作用し、回収コストが閾値を規定する一方、石油回収益は閾値以下の普及経路に影響する。

English

This study couples an alternating-offer bargaining model with a two-population evolutionary game to explain how carbon allowance prices and allocation constraints drive CCS-EOR adoption. Using four Chinese-calibrated scenarios, it finds critical allowance prices of 64.9 and 110.0 USD/tCO2 for low- and high-capture-cost cases. Carbon pricing acts indirectly on utilization firms via bargained CO2 prices; capture costs set the threshold while oil recovery benefits shape diffusion below it.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本ではCCSはGX推進戦略の重点分野であり、炭素価格(GXサーチャージ・排出量取引)設計とCCS事業化の関係を考える上で、閾値価格の定量分析は政策議論に直接示唆を与える。

In the global GX context

As carbon markets and CCUS scale under ISSB/transition-finance frameworks, this paper offers a quantitative method to link allowance price design to CCUS project economics, informing how carbon pricing thresholds can unlock industrial decarbonization investment.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:炭素価格とCCUS普及の相互作用を進化ゲームと交渉理論で統合的にモデル化する手法として参考になる。

🏢実務担当者:CCS-EOR事業の投資判断において、炭素価格水準と回収コストが採算閾値に与える感度を把握できる。

🏛政策担当者:CCUS普及を促す炭素価格・無償割当設計の閾値設定に定量的根拠を提供する。

📄 Abstract(原文)

Large-scale diffusion of carbon capture, storage, and enhanced oil recovery (CCS-EOR) technology requires coordinated decisions by CO2 capture and utilization enterprises, yet their economic incentives are interdependent. This study aims to explain how carbon allowance prices and allocation constraints affect bilateral CO2 pricing and the subsequent adoption of CCS-EOR technology. An alternating-offer bargaining model for determining the CO2 transaction price is coupled with a two-population evolutionary game describing the adoption decisions of capture and utilization enterprises. This integrated approach examines how carbon-market policies shape bargaining outcomes, economic returns, and adoption strategies of both enterprise types. Four techno-economic scenarios calibrated to Chinese CCS-EOR projects are examined using equilibrium analysis, numerical diffusion simulations, a ±10% parameter sensitivity analysis, and stochastic allowance price robustness tests. The critical allowance prices are 64.9 and 110.0 USD/tCO2 for low- and high-capture-cost scenarios, respectively, a difference of 45.1 USD/tCO2 (approximately 69.5% of the low-capture-cost threshold). A ±10% change in operating capture cost shifts these thresholds by ±6.15 and ±10.66 USD/tCO2, whereas the same change in levelized fixed capture cost shifts both thresholds by ±0.34 USD/tCO2. Simulations using a 19 × 19 grid of initial adoption probabilities quantify the basin of attraction of joint adoption; the critical carbon price depends on capture costs, while oil recovery benefits and other techno-economic factors affect the diffusion trajectories below the threshold. Robustness analysis is conducted, considering allowance price fluctuations under a mean-reverting process across different noise intensities (σ = 0 and 6 USD/tCO2). The findings show that carbon pricing influences utilization enterprises indirectly through bargained CO2 transaction prices and that coupling bilateral price negotiations with evolutionary adoption decisions offers a more comprehensive explanation of CCS-EOR technology diffusion and differentiated policy requirements.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。