← 論文一覧に戻る

Contextual factors for effective climate policies in the energy sector: a systematic review of entry points

エネルギー部門における効果的な気候政策の文脈的要因:エントリーポイントの体系的レビュー (AI 翻訳)

Rahel Mandaroux, Sophie Fuchs, Vignesh Raghunathan

Figshare📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-01#エネルギー転換Origin: Global対象セクター: energy
DOI: 10.6084/m9.figshare.32842501.v1
原典: https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.32842501.v1

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は機械学習を活用したシステマティックレビューにより、エネルギー部門の気候政策効果に影響する文脈要因を分析。制度的容量、利害関係者支援、市場構造が主要な促進要因であり、地域ごとに異なる政策介入の組み合わせを特定。先進国と新興国で異なるエントリーポイントを示した。

English

This paper conducts a machine learning-assisted systematic review to identify contextual factors enabling effective climate policies in the energy sector. It finds that institutional capacity, interest group support, and market structure are key enablers, and identifies distinct regional groups with different combinations of policy interventions. The results offer actionable guidance for policymakers.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のエネルギー政策(FIT、入札制度、石炭フェーズアウト)における制度的・経済的文脈を考慮する上で示唆に富む。特に、地域ごとに異なる政策エントリーポイントの提示は、日本の地域特性に合わせた政策設計に活用可能。

In the global GX context

This review provides a global framework linking policy effectiveness to contextual factors, relevant for countries designing energy transition policies. It supports evidence-based policy making under TCFD/ISSB-aligned climate strategies by identifying region-specific entry points.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a systematic methodology and empirical evidence on how contextual factors moderate policy effectiveness in energy transition.

🏛政策担当者:Offers actionable entry points and regional groupings for designing effective climate policies in the energy sector.

📄 Abstract(原文)

<b>Background:</b> The effectiveness of climate policies in the energy sector depends on contextual factors specific to the implementing region. Understanding which contextual factors co-occur with policies supporting the energy sector transition towards climate neutrality is central to determining promising policy interventions in regions with similar characteristics. <b>Methods:</b> We conduct a machine learning-assisted systematic literature review to answer the following question: which combinations of effective policy interventions and contextual factors are identified in the empirical literature as contributing to the deployment of mitigation technologies or transitioning away from fossil fuels? These combinations of contextual factors and effective policy interventions are distinct opportunities for change, and thus entry points for a transition to climate neutrality. Our review exclusively covers studies that conduct an ex-post evaluation of climate policies in the energy sector and are published after the decision on the Paris Agreement in 2015. <b>Results:</b> We find that the three enabling contextual factors most frequently cited by the literature are institutional capacity (institutional feasibility), interest group support (social feasibility), and market structure (economic feasibility). Overall, the majority of enabling contextual factors identified in the literature relate to ‘economic feasibility’. Further, we identify distinct regional groups that share similar entry points supporting the transition in the energy sector. Our findings offer actionable guidance for policy makers seeking feasible energy transition pathways in their national context. Climate policy effectiveness in the energy sector varies systematically across regional contexts: institutional capacity, interest group support, and market structure are the key contextual factors shaping effective policy intervention. We identify five regional groups for renewable deployment: in developed economies, (i) advanced financial markets use portfolio standards and market certificates; (ii) institutional capacity and policy continuity contexts use FiTs and state loans; (iii) local governance contexts enable regulatory streamlining. In emerging economies, (iv) strong state control contexts use FiTs, auctions, subsidies, and state investment; (v) cost-driven regions use auctions and risk-sharing to meet rising energy demand. For transitioning away from coal: (i) institution-based transitions use stakeholder commissions and retirement premiums; (ii) market-driven exits rely on substitution and regulatory pressure; (iii) financially constrained contexts depend on international climate finance.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。