土地整備の炭素効果：知識の進化、分析パラダイム、今後の研究課題
Carbon Effects of Land Consolidation: Knowledge Evolution, Analytical Paradigms, and a Future Research Agenda (原題)
Wei Shan, Xiaobin Jin, Hanbing Li, Bo Han, Xiaolin Zhang, Junjun Zhu, Wei Zhang, Yinkang Zhou
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本レビューは、土地整備（LC）の炭素効果に関する研究の進展を、書誌分析と355件の文献の統合的レビューにより明らかにした。研究は、建設排出や土壌炭素などの要素別評価から、ライフサイクル会計や生態系サービスとの相互作用、空間最適化、政策評価へと拡大している。炭素会計、生物地球化学プロセス、空間土地システム、意思決定支援とガバナンスの4つのパラダイムを特定し、統合の課題を指摘した。
English
This review maps the evolution of research on carbon effects of land consolidation (LC) using bibliometric analysis and synthesis of 355 records. It identifies a shift from component-based assessments to life-cycle accounting, ecosystem-service interactions, spatial optimization, and policy evaluation. Four paradigms—carbon accounting, biogeochemical processes, spatial land systems, and decision support/governance—are outlined, highlighting integration challenges and future research directions.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本では、農地整備や国土計画における炭素貯留の役割が注目されており、本レビューの枠組みは、日本の土地改良事業におけるカーボンニュートラル政策との連携を考える上で参考になる。特に、ライフサイクル会計の標準化は、今後のSSBJ開示や農地の炭素クレジット制度設計に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
Globally, this review contributes to the growing literature on land-based climate mitigation and carbon accounting. It provides a comprehensive framework for integrating carbon effects into land-use planning and governance, relevant to international efforts like the Paris Agreement and emerging carbon markets. The call for standardized life-cycle accounting aligns with ISSB and other disclosure frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a structured overview of research paradigms and gaps in land consolidation carbon effects, useful for framing future studies.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into how land consolidation projects can be designed to enhance carbon benefits, relevant for sustainability reporting and land management.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the need for standardized accounting and governance integration to support climate mitigation in land-use policies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Land consolidation (LC) is increasingly expected to support food security, ecological restoration, rural development, and climate mitigation, yet evidence on its carbon effects remains fragmented across engineering, ecological, spatial, and governance research. This review combines bibliometric mapping with structured evidence synthesis of 355 records from WoS and CNKI to examine knowledge evolution, analytical paradigms, and their integration. The field has expanded from component-based assessments of construction emissions, soil carbon, and land-cover change toward life-cycle accounting, carbon fractions, ecosystem-service interactions, spatial optimization, and policy evaluation. WoS-indexed and Chinese-language literature show distinct but increasingly convergent orientations shaped by differences in intervention contexts, disciplinary traditions, analytical scales, and available evidence. Four complementary paradigms are identified: carbon accounting, biogeochemical processes, spatial land systems, and decision support and governance. Together, these paradigms reveal interconnected carbon pathways but remain constrained by inconsistent accounting boundaries, weak process–scale–time linkages, and limited integration with land-governance decisions. Future research should therefore advance standardized life-cycle and multi-scale accounting, mechanism-based assessment of long-term carbon and ecosystem-service dynamics, and digitally and institutionally enabled low-carbon governance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.3390/land15081517first seen 2026-08-22 05:10:34
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。