気候関連燃料税増税に対する公平感の空間的考察
Spatial perspective on perceived fairness of climate-related fuel tax increases (原題)
Tikli Loivaranta, Piia Lundberg, Jukka Käyhkö
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
フィンランドの3地域で2022年に実施したサーベイを用い、燃料税増税の公平感を空間的公正の観点から分析した研究。農村部・過疎地域の住民ほど増税を不公平と認識し、気候懸念や政策への信頼、政治的志向が公平感に影響することを示す。過疎地域では気候懸念と信頼が低い傾向も確認された。
English
Using a June 2022 survey across three Finnish regions, this study examines perceived fairness of fuel tax increases through a spatial justice lens. Rural and sparsely populated residents perceive the tax as less fair, and climate concern, trust, and political orientation shape fairness perceptions. Climate concern and trust were lower in sparsely populated regions, highlighting distributional challenges for carbon pricing.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも炭素税・カーボンプライシング導入議論が進む中、地域間の負担格差と受容性は政策設計上の重要論点。地方部の不公平感への配慮は日本版ICP設計の示唆となる。
In the global GX context
As carbon pricing and fuel taxation face political backlash globally, this work informs how distributional and spatial fairness shape public acceptance—relevant to CBAM-adjacent debates and just-transition framing in disclosure and policy.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:炭素価格政策の受容性と空間的公正の実証的関連を定量化する枠組みを提供する。
🏛政策担当者:燃料税・炭素税設計では地域間の負担格差と信頼醸成を考慮すべきことを示唆する。
📄 Abstract（原文）
We explore the perceived fairness of fuel tax increases from a spatial perspective. Actions in transport sector are needed to meet climate change mitigation targets, but such policies may disproportionately impact rural and urban residents, leading to spatially varying experiences of injustice. Perceived fairness is the most important determinant of public opinion towards mitigation policies, but perceived fairness of these policies itself has been understudied. We combine our inquiry of perceived fairness regarding fuel tax increases with considerations of spatial justice. We explore, whether residential area type, region, and variables such as climate concern, trust in climate policies, political orientation and use of fossil-fuelled car, are associated with perceived fairness of increasing fuel tax, and whether there are regional differences in these variables. Data were collected via a survey in June 2022 in three regions with different characteristics in Finland: Helsinki, Finland Proper, and Northern Ostrobothnia. Our results reveal that residents in rural areas and sparsely populated regions perceive fuel tax increases as less fair. Climate concern, trust and political orientation were found to influence fairness perceptions. Moreover, climate concern and trust were lower in sparsely populated regions. Considerations of fairness perceptions are important for successful climate mitigation policy.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2026.109262first seen 2026-10-25 04:39:43 · last seen 2026-11-04 04:38:38
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。