Co-benefits and trade-offs of carbon revenue recycling schemes on China's water, energy and food systems under carbon neutrality target
中国の水・エネルギー・食料システムにおける炭素収入リサイクル制度の共便益とトレードオフ：カーボンニュートラル目標の下で (AI 翻訳)
Xiangyan Qian, Hongdian Jiang, Yun-Fei Yao, Lijing Liu, Qiaomei Liang, Yuli Shan, Hubacek Klaus
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本研究は、中国のカーボンニュートラル達成に向けた炭素価格政策において、炭素収入の4つのリサイクル制度が水・エネルギー・食料（WEF）資源に与える影響を動的CGEモデルで分析。家計への一括移転は都市と農村の福祉向上と所得格差縮小に有効だが、農業は食料生産と水保全のトレードオフに直面。間接税削減がGDP損失抑制とエネルギー節約に優れる。
English
This study analyzes four carbon revenue recycling schemes in China's carbon neutrality path using a dynamic CGE model. Lump-sum transfers to households improve welfare and reduce urban-rural income gaps, while indirect tax cuts minimize GDP loss and enhance energy savings. The study reveals trade-offs between water saving and food production in agriculture.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
中国の事例ではあるが、炭素収入のリサイクル制度の設計は日本のカーボンプライシング政策（GXリーグや排出量取引制度）における家計還元や税制改革の議論に示唆を与える。特に、水・エネルギー・食料の相互連関を考慮した分析は、日本でも重要な視点である。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a comprehensive modeling approach for carbon revenue recycling, which is highly relevant for global carbon pricing design. It highlights the trade-offs and co-benefits across water, energy, and food systems, which are often overlooked in carbon policy evaluation. The findings can inform policy design in countries implementing carbon pricing with revenue recycling.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Offers a comprehensive CGE framework for analyzing cross-sectoral impacts of carbon revenue recycling, valuable for modeling carbon neutrality policies.
🏢実務担当者:Provides insights on how different revenue recycling schemes affect resource security and household welfare, which can inform corporate advocacy and sustainability strategy.
🏛政策担当者:Directly relevant for designing carbon pricing policies with revenue recycling to balance emission reductions with water, energy, and food security.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This study explores the synergistic management of the water-energy-food (WEF) resources in China by rationally recycling carbon revenues in the process of achieving carbon neutrality through carbon pricing. This study constructs a dynamic computable general equilibrium model and proposes four typical carbon revenue recycling schemes to simulate the impact on WEF resources and macroeconomics in terms of resource production, consumption, urban and rural household incomes, expenditures and welfare. Returning carbon revenues to households as a lump-sum transfer would increase the welfare of urban and rural households, reduce the urban-rural income gap and promote food supply security. With the shift from traditional thermal power, electricity will show the greatest potential for water savings though will be offset by increased water use from hydropower and biomass. Agriculture will always face trade-offs between stable food production and water saving under different schemes. In comparing the effectiveness of schemes, the no revenue recycling and the transfer to households will be most effective for water saving and rural agricultural development, respectively. Reducing indirect taxes offers superior benefits by reducing gross domestic product loss, contributing to energy savings, increasing profits in agricultural sectors' and enhancing the effectiveness of the water-energy-food system. This study can address the gaps in existing studies that focus on the impact of carbon reduction policies on individual resources and the lack of comprehensive analysis under the carbon neutrality target.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- semanticscholar https://doi.org/10.1108/caer-01-2025-0011first seen 2026-05-15 17:13:45
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。