循環経済への移行文脈におけるロシアエネルギー政策実施の諸相
Some aspects of Russia's energy policy implementation in the context of the transition to a circular economy (原題)
Квон Гульнара Магсумовна, О. Г. Поздеева
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ロシアのエネルギー政策における循環経済的要素を、再生可能エネルギー、資源効率、廃棄物処理の観点から評価した研究。2050年までのエネルギー戦略には灰・スラグ利用や随伴ガス効率化などの資源節約要素があるものの、再生可能エネルギー比率の低さやリサイクル目標の欠如から本格的な循環経済移行には至っていないと結論づける。閉ループ型技術連鎖の構築と戦略的手法の適用を提言する。
English
This paper assesses circular-economy elements in Russia's energy policy, examining renewable energy, resource efficiency, and energy-sector waste. It finds that Russia's Energy Strategy to 2050 includes some resource-saving measures (ash/slag utilization, associated gas efficiency, loss reduction) but lacks full circular transition due to an extensive resource model, export orientation, low renewables share, and no equipment-recycling targets. It recommends closed-loop technological chains and strategic planning linking global sustainability goals with national and regional priorities.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
ロシアの国家エネルギー戦略と循環経済の整合性を扱う点は、資源制約下での移行政策設計を考える日本側の参考になり得るが、SSBJ・有報・投資家対応など日本のGX開示実務との直接接点は乏しい。
In the global GX context
Offers a non-Western, resource-exporting perspective on how circular-economy principles surface (or fail to) in national energy strategy, useful as a contrast case for ISSB/CSRD-aligned transition planning debates that assume decarbonization-first frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:国家エネルギー戦略を循環経済基準で評価する分析枠組み(Kvintの戦略化手法)の応用例として参照できる。
🏛政策担当者:資源輸出国における移行政策が脱炭素と経済効率の間でどう妥協するかを示す事例として留意できる。
📄 Abstract(原文)
Subject. Implementation of the energy policy of the Russian Federation in the context of the transition to a circular economy, including indicators of the development of renewable energy, resource efficiency and strategic planning of the fuel and energy complex. Objectives. To identify and evaluate circular aspects in Russia's modern energy policy, analyze the compliance of the targets of the Energy Strategy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2050 with the principles of a closed-loop economy, and substantiate the directions for deepening resource-saving transformation of the energy sector. Methods. A systematic approach, comparative and statistical analysis of data from international organizations and national strategic documents, content analysis, comparison of target indicators with closed-loop criteria, as well as V.L. Kvint's strategizing methodology are applied. Results. The analysis of global trends has been carried out and contradictions between decarbonization and economic efficiency have been identified; the types of waste in the energy sector have been identified; the dynamics of capacity and electricity generation based on renewable energy sources in the Russian Federation for 2018–2024, as well as the dynamics of losses in the electric grid, have been shown. It has been established that the Energy Strategy of the Russian Federation for the period up to 2050 contains certain resource-saving elements (utilization of ash and slag, increased efficiency of associated petroleum gas use, reduction of losses), but does not imply a full-scale transition to a circular economy due to the preservation of an extensive resource model, export orientation, low share of renewable energy sources and lack of targets for recycling of equipment. Conclusions. The transition to a circular economy in the Russian energy sector is a strategic necessity, but at the current stage it is being implemented mainly through increasing resource efficiency. Deepening the transformation requires the formation of closed technological chains, the promotion of recycling, and the application of a strategic methodology that links global sustainable development goals with national priorities and regional specifics.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.24891/lgorkdfirst seen 2026-10-25 04:38:37 · last seen 2026-10-30 04:41:32
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。