エネルギー安全保障とエネルギー正義の結節点におけるバイオマス乾留の社会技術転換フレームワーク
A socio-technical transition framework for biomass torrefaction at the nexus of energy security and energy justice (原題)
Congyu Zhang, Bo Cao, Yuting Wang, Wei-Hsin Chen
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
バイオマス乾留（トーレファクション）を高品質固体燃料への転換技術として、エネルギー安全保障の多次元（可用性・アクセス・affordability・受容性）とエネルギー正義（分配的・手続的・承認・回復）の観点から評価するレビュー。技術経済的有望性だけでは不十分で、正義志向のガバナンスと結びついた制度設計が持続的統合の鍵だと結論づける。共便益戦略・持続可能性認証・コミュニティ主導ビジネスモデルを政策課題として提示する。
English
This review frames biomass torrefaction as a socio-technical pathway, assessing its contribution to multidimensional energy security (availability, accessibility, affordability, acceptability) and its energy justice implications across distributive, procedural, recognitional, and restorative dimensions. It synthesizes advances in torrefaction science, reactor design, and sustainability assessment, concluding that techno-economic promise is necessary but insufficient without justice-oriented governance. It proposes a research and policy agenda centered on co-benefits, robust sustainability certification, and community-centric business models.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本ではバイオマス混焼・燃料調達が電力脱炭素とFIT/FIP制度の焦点となるが、本稿のエネルギー正義・認証論は地域合意形成や持続可能性調達基準の議論に示唆を与える。SSBJ開示との直接接続は弱い。
In the global GX context
Adds a justice-and-governance lens to bioenergy transition debates that global disclosure frameworks (CSRD, ISSB) increasingly touch via sustainability certification and supply-chain due diligence. Useful for framing biomass as more than a renewable box-tick in transition finance narratives.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:エネルギー正義の多次元評価をバイオマス技術評価に組み込む分析枠組みとして参照できる。
🏢実務担当者:バイオマス燃料調達・混焼の際に、認証と地域合意形成を事業リスク管理に組み込む視点を提供する。
🏛政策担当者:バイオマス政策設計に正義志向ガバナンスと持続可能性認証の要件を組み込む根拠となる。
📄 Abstract（原文）
The global energy transition necessitates a critical re-evaluation of bioenergy’s role and moving beyond its conventional perception as a mere renewable source, aligning with the Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), particularly SDG 7 (Affordable and Clean Energy) and SDG 13 (Climate Action). Biomass torrefaction, a mild thermochemical pretreatment, emerges as a pivotal technology that can fundamentally upgrade biomass into a high-quality solid biofuel. This review examines torrefaction as a socio-technical pathway that may contribute to multidimensional energy security while identifying potential energy justice implications across distributive, procedural, recognitional, and restorative dimensions within the bioenergy sector. This review systematically synthesizes recent advancements in torrefaction science, reactor design, and sustainability assessment. A novel analytical framework is developed to evaluate its role in enhancing energy security across the dimensions of availability, accessibility, affordability, and acceptability. Crucially, this review offers a systematic energy justice-oriented assessment of the torrefaction pathway, critically evaluating its implications across the distributive, procedural, recognitional, and restorative justice dimensions. The analysis reveals that the techno-economic promise of torrefaction is necessary but insufficient for its sustainable integration. Its success depends on active governance that is explicitly coupled with justice-oriented frameworks. This review concludes by proposing an integrated research and policy agenda that prioritizes co-benefit strategies, robust sustainability certification, and community-centric business models to steer the development of torrefaction towards a future of security, low carbon, and equity. Not applicable.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s43937-026-00209-5first seen 2026-11-06 05:04:33
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。