EU taxonomy as an instrument of sustainable finance: prospects for implementation in Ukraine
持続可能な金融の手段としてのEUタクソノミー:ウクライナでの実施の見通し (AI 翻訳)
Illia Mamaiev
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、EUタクソノミーの法的メカニズムと制度設計を詳細に分析し、ウクライナへの導入可能性を検討する。ウクライナでは国家タクソノミーが未整備であり、EU規制との整合性や開示義務の導入が国際資本へのアクセスに不可欠と結論づける。具体的な勧告として、規制(EC)2020/852に基づく国家タクソノミーの採択や省庁間協力体制の構築を提唱する。
English
This paper examines the legal mechanisms and institutional architecture of the EU Taxonomy and assesses its implementation prospects in Ukraine. It finds that Ukraine lacks a legally established national taxonomy and concludes that dynamic alignment with EU law and sustainability disclosure obligations are prerequisites for accessing international capital. Recommendations include adopting a national taxonomy based on Regulation (EU) 2020/852 and establishing interagency coordination.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は独自のグリーンタクソノミーを持たないが、EUタクソノミーの枠組みは国際的な参照点となっている。本論文は、非EU国がどのようにタクソノミーを導入し、開示基盤を整備するかというプロセスを示しており、日本のグリーン金融戦略やSSBJとの連携を検討する上で参考になる。
In the global GX context
The EU Taxonomy is a cornerstone of the global sustainable finance architecture, influencing frameworks like the ISSB and CSRD. This paper provides a case study of how a non-EU country (Ukraine) navigates alignment with EU standards, offering insights for other jurisdictions—including Japan—that are developing or updating their own green taxonomies and disclosure requirements.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a detailed regulatory analysis of the EU Taxonomy's institutional framework and its adaptation by a non-EU country, useful for comparative taxonomy studies.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a roadmap for companies and financial institutions in Ukraine (and similar economies) on aligning with EU Taxonomy disclosure requirements.
🏛政策担当者:Relevant for regulators considering adoption or alignment with the EU Taxonomy, as it outlines necessary legislative and coordination mechanisms.
📄 Abstract(原文)
Problem setting. The global transition toward environmentally sustainable economic activities is driven by the need to protect the environment and reduce dependence on fossil fuels. The EU Taxonomy has become a central regulatory tool for directing capital into green and climate-neutral projects and now serves as a reference point for countries seeking closer integration with European financial markets. Ukraine faces the task of adapting this framework to its legal system, which is essential both for meeting EU integration commitments and for attracting investment into post-war reconstruction, particularly in renewable energy. Analysis of recent research and publications. The development of a national taxonomy of sustainable activities and the principles of sustainable finance has been addressed by Ukrainian scholars such as A.A. Honta, M.Yu. Hryhorak, O. I. Volovyk, I. O. Makarenko, R.M. Fominov, N.V. Trushkina, H. P. Bortnikov, T. V. Oriekhova ta O. M. Riabchyn. Purpose of research. To examine the development process, legal mechanisms, and institutional architecture of the EU Taxonomy, to assess the state of its implementation in Ukraine, and to formulate recommendations for introducing a national taxonomy of sustainable economic activities. Article’s main body. The article examines the evolution, legal mechanisms, and institutional architecture of the EU Taxonomy as a classifier of sustainable economic activities, including Regulation (EU) 2020/852 and the relevant delegated acts. It demonstrates the Taxonomy’s integration into financial and corporate disclosure regimes under the Sustainable Finance Disclosure Regulation (SFDR) and the Corporate Sustainability Reporting Directive (CSRD). The role of the European Commission, the Platform on Sustainable Finance, the Member States Expert Group, and the European Supervisory Authorities in shaping and updating technical screening criteria is characterized. Emphasis is placed on the market effect of transparency: although the Taxonomy does not impose prohibitions, its standardised disclosure requirements reduce information asymmetry, highlight transformational and regulatory risks associated with brown assets, and stimulate the reallocation of capital towards green projects, particularly renewable energy. The article analyses the current state of introducing a national taxonomy in Ukraine, revealing the absence of a legally established system despite fragmented initiatives by the NSSMC, NBU, the Ministry of Economy, and other coordination platforms. It concludes that dynamic alignment with EU law and the introduction of sustainability disclosure obligations are essential prerequisites for accessing international capital. It is recommended to adopt a national taxonomy based on the requirements of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 and the accompanying ESG-related acts; to establish an interagency body under the NSSMC responsible for developing and updating technical criteria; to define mechanisms of coordination among key public authorities; and to introduce a system for training specialists in sustainable finance. Conclusions and prospects for development. For the effective implementation of the taxonomy in Ukraine, it is recommended to: (1) adopt a national taxonomy based on the provisions of Regulation (EU) 2020/852 on taxonomy and the accompanying regulatory acts (including ESG disclosure requirements for large enterprises and financial institutions); (2) establish a specialised interagency body under the National Securities and Stock Market Commission (NSSMC) responsible for developing and updating technical screening criteria in alignment with the EU Taxonomy; (3) define the distribution of competences and mechanisms of coordination among the NSSMC, the Government Office for European and Euro-Atlantic Integration of Ukraine, the Green Transition Office under the Ministry of Economy, the Ukrainian Climate Office (including the Sustainable Finance Platform), and the National Bank of Ukraine regarding the national taxonomy; (4) create a system for training specialists in sustainable finance through the “Diia.Osvita” platform to ensure the capacity of banks and companies to comply with the new requirements.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openaire https://doi.org/10.37772/2518-1718-2025-4(52)-14first seen 2026-05-14 21:36:03
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。