サステナビリティ・トランジションのシステム・アーキタイプを明らかにする
Uncovering the systems archetypes of sustainability transitions (原題)
Brunilde Verrier, Benjamin Kenneth Sovacool, William J. Grace, Irene Pluchinotta, N Zimmerman, Neil D. Strachan, M McManus
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、SengeとMeadowsのシステム・アーキタイプ（政策抵抗、成長と過小投資、共有地の悲劇など）を診断ツールとして用い、エネルギー転換のボトルネックを可視化・予測する枠組みを提示する。複雑系のフィードバックや誤認がビジネスと社会リスクの交差点で転換をどう阻害するかを示し、エネルギー modellingを補完しステークホルダー対話を促す概念的研究である。
English
This conceptual paper applies Senge and Meadows' systems archetypes—such as policy resistance, growth and underinvestment, and tragedy of the commons—as diagnostic tools to anticipate bottlenecks in sustainability and energy transitions. It highlights feedback mechanisms and misperceptions at the intersection of business and societal risks, offering a systemic lens that complements energy modelling and supports stakeholder dialogue.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本企業のGX経営やSSBJ開示の文脈では、移行計画の策定やシナリオ分析における組織的・行動的障壁を整理する思考枠組みとして活用できる。特に政策抵抗や過小投資のパターンは、国内のエネルギー転換や脱炭素投資の遅延要因を説明する際に示唆的である。
In the global GX context
For global GX practice, this paper offers a conceptual vocabulary for diagnosing why transition plans stall—useful for TCFD/ISSB scenario analysis and transition finance discussions where systemic barriers and policy resistance are often under-theorised. It bridges organisational behaviour and climate transition literature.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a systems-archetype framework to structure interdisciplinary research on transition bottlenecks and feedback dynamics.
🏢実務担当者:Offers a diagnostic lens for identifying organisational and policy resistance patterns when designing corporate transition strategies.
🏛政策担当者:Suggests archetype-based diagnostics to anticipate policy resistance and underinvestment traps in energy transition policymaking.
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract Moving towards sustainable and resilient energy practices is a challenge with profound organisational and behavioural implications. While the importance of systems approaches in transition management is recognised, key principles of systems thinking such as understanding how complex systems behave, and our role within them, are often overlooked. This paper highlights interconnections, feedback mechanisms, and misperceptions shaping transitions at the intersection of business and societal risks. It uses Senge and Meadows’ work on systems archetypes, such as ‘policy resistance’, ‘growth and underinvestment’ or the ‘tragedy of the commons’, as a diagnostic tool to illuminate and anticipate transition bottlenecks. This approach responds to growing calls for more systemic conceptualisations of the multi-system dynamics hindering sustainability transitions. It can enrich understanding across disciplines, complement energy modelling, and spark stakeholder conversations to contribute to collaboration in a world increasingly shaped by conflicting narratives.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1088/1748-9326/aea873first seen 2026-10-18 04:42:39
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。