Green extractivism in the making: A critical discourse analysis of institutional, media and community narratives on Colombia's energy transition (2014–2025)
生成されるグリーンエクストラクティビズム：コロンビアのエネルギー移行に関する制度、メディア、コミュニティの言説の批判的談話分析（2014-2025） (AI 翻訳)
María Cecilia Ruiz Cardona, Carlos Humberto González Escobar
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本論文は、コロンビアのエネルギー移行に関する21,636件のメディア記事と政策文書を批判的談話分析し、3つの言説領域（制度、メディア、コミュニティ）の摩擦から「グリーンエクストラクティビズム」という分析カテゴリーが生まれることを示す。持続可能性、エネルギー安全保障、効率・市場、参加・正義、エクストラクティビズムの5つのテーマを横断的に分析し、技術官僚的枠組みと地域的・文化的・分配的懸念の非対称性を明らかにした。再生可能エネルギーへの移行が化石燃料時代の囲い込み論理を再生産するリスクを指摘し、エネルギー正義研究に示唆を与える。
English
This paper conducts a critical discourse analysis of 21,636 media items and policy documents on Colombia's energy transition, identifying the emergent category of 'green extractivism' at the friction between institutional, media, and community discourses. It maps five transversal themes—sustainability-decarbonization, energy security-sovereignty, efficiency-market, participation-justice, and extractivism—revealing asymmetries between technocratic framings and territorial concerns. The study argues that displacing extractive logics to renewable substrates risks reproducing enclave dynamics, offering insights for energy justice in resource-dependent Global South economies.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも再生可能エネルギー拡大に伴い、地域コミュニティと事業者の摩擦が顕在化している。本論文の「グリーンエクストラクティビズム」の概念は、日本のGX政策が単なる技術的置き換えに終わらず、公正な移行を実現する上で示唆に富む。特に、洋上風力や地熱開発における地域参加の重要性を再認識させる。
In the global GX context
As renewable energy frontiers expand globally, the concept of 'green extractivism' provides a critical lens for examining whether the energy transition replicates colonial extraction patterns. This paper offers a heuristic for Global South contexts and for international investors and policymakers to avoid reproducing social inequalities in green projects, contributing to debates on just transition and energy justice under the ISSB and CSRD frameworks.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Scholars in energy justice, discourse analysis, and political ecology will find the conceptual model of 'green extractivism as emergent at discursive friction' a useful heuristic for analyzing renewable energy conflicts.
🏢実務担当者:Sustainability and community relations teams in renewable energy companies can use the paper's findings to anticipate and address local resistance by ensuring genuine participation beyond technocratic framing.
🏛政策担当者:Energy transition policymakers in resource-dependent economies should note the risk of green extractivism and incorporate territorial and distributive justice into regulatory design to avoid backlash.
📄 Abstract（原文）
• Critical discourse analysis of 21,636 media items on Colombia's energy transition. • Three discursive fields — institutional, media, community — coexist in tension. • Five thematic categories structure the debate from 2014 through 2025. • Green extractivism emerges as analytic category at the friction between fields. • Just transition risks reproducing fossil-era enclave logics under green discourse. Colombia's energy transition has unfolded across three consecutive policy cycles between 2014 and 2025, advancing from the establishment of a formal regime for non-conventional renewable energy sources (FNCER) to the articulation of a Just Energy Transition (TEJ) agenda. This article examines how this transition has been narrated across three discursive fields — institutional, media and community — and how the friction between them produces the emergent analytic category of green extractivism. Drawing on a structured analysis of policy documents, normative instruments and a media corpus of 21,636 items systematized through the Media Presence Index (IPM = 25.4), we identify five transversal thematic categories structuring the debate: sustainability-decarbonization, energy security-sovereignty, efficiency-market, participation-justice, and extractivism. The cross-tabulation reveals systematic asymmetries: the institutional and media fields converge in technocratic-economic framings, while the community field privileges territorial, cultural and distributive concerns. Three structural tensions traverse the corpus: (i) technocratic management versus territorial dispute; (ii) fossil-fiscal security versus climate urgency and social justice; and (iii) the Just Transition discourse versus the lived persistence of enclave logics. The article argues that the displacement of extractive logics from fossil to renewable substrates emerges not within any single field but at the friction between them, with implications for energy justice scholarship in resource-dependent Global South economies. The conceptual model — green extractivism as emergent category at the friction between discursive fields — offers a heuristic for contexts where renewable frontiers overlap with histories of extraction, suggesting that avoiding its reproduction requires intervention in the discursive scaffolding of governance.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.exis.2026.102003first seen 2026-07-27 04:49:48
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。