新興技術の導入による気候変動リスクの緩和：ファストファッション・サプライチェーンの文脈比較的考察
Mitigating Climate Change Risks by Adopting Emerging Technologies: A Contextual Comparative Exploration of Fast Fashion Supply Chains (原題)
Muhammad Tasadduq Khan, Awais Ahmad Khan, Piyyia Rafi-ul-Shan, Rizwan Ahmed, Shlomo Tarba
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
ファストファッションのサプライチェーンが抱える気候変動リスクを、パキスタンと英国の専門家インタビューで比較した質的研究。制度的圧力の違いにより、パキスタン企業は英国ブランド向けにGHG削減や再生可能エネルギーを採用し、英国企業は規制・経済課題への対応に迫られる。両国ともAI分析、IoT、ブロックチェーン、3Dプリンティング等を導入するが、初期コストや人材・データ統合の課題に直面し、技術と事業の整合や協働で対処している。
English
A qualitative comparative study of climate change risks in fast fashion supply chains, based on expert interviews in Pakistan and the UK. Institutional pressures drive Pakistani firms to adopt GHG reduction, sustainable materials and renewables for UK brands, while UK firms face regulatory and economic challenges. Both adopt AI analytics, IoT, blockchain traceability and 3D printing, but struggle with high costs, skills gaps and data integration, responding via tech-business alignment and collaboration.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
Scope 3排出の大部分を占めるサプライチェーン上流のリスクと、AI・ブロックチェーン等によるトレーサビリティ確保の実践例は、SSBJ基準や有報でのScope 3開示、サプライヤー・エンゲージメントを進める日本企業にとって参考になる。特に新興国サプライヤーとの協働や技術導入の障壁は、日本企業の調達リスク管理に示唆を与える。
In the global GX context
This study adds empirical evidence on how institutional pressures shape supply-chain decarbonization and technology adoption across developed and developing countries, relevant to ISSB/CSRD Scope 3 disclosure and due diligence requirements. It highlights practical barriers (cost, skills, data integration) that global fashion brands and their suppliers face when implementing traceability and AI-based tools.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:制度的理論を用いたサプライチェーン脱炭素の比較研究として、Scope 3や技術導入の文脈依存性を理解する材料になる。
🏢実務担当者:サプライヤーとの協働やAI・ブロックチェーンによるトレーサビリティ導入の課題と対策を、Scope 3開示・調達リスク管理に活かせる。
🏛政策担当者:新興国サプライヤーへの制度的圧力と技術導入支援の必要性を示し、サプライチェーン全体の排出削減政策に示唆を与える。
📄 Abstract（原文）
Abstract Empirical research suggests that the fast fashion (FF) industry is a major contributor to global climate change. Fast-fashion supply chains (FFSCs) are inherently complex due to the multiplicity of processes, locations, and stakeholders involved. This research explores the key climate change risks, response strategies, and application of emerging technologies in the comparative context of developing and developed countries. Institutional theory was used as a theoretical lens, and the research data were collected by using expert interviews from industry experts in Pakistan and the UK. The analysis shows numerous climate change risks posed by FFSC at multiple tiers, ranging from raw materials to the retailing of products. The FF industry in Pakistan is more focused on meeting the needs of UK fashion brands by adopting global frameworks to reduce their greenhouse gas emissions, including using sustainable materials and adopting changes according to the environmental standards and renewable energy due to coercive, normative, and mimetic pressures. In contrast, coercive and mimetic pressures forcing UK fashion companies to address regulatory and economic challenges and deal with persistent organisational and cultural issues including fast-changing customer requirements. To mitigate climate change risks, companies in both contexts are adopting emerging technologies such as AI-based analytics, internet of things, automation, blockchain and digital traceability-based solutions, and 3D printing. However, they face challenges such as high initial costs, human capital gaps, and data integration issues. To mitigate these challenges, companies in both contexts are adopting strategies such as technology–business alignment, collaboration with technology partners and multiple stakeholders, pilot testing of new technologies, cultural transformation, and structural changes.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1007/s11575-026-00644-5first seen 2026-10-02 04:37:49
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。