エネルギー転換と労働者階級
Energy Transition and Working Classes (原題)
Aina Muñoz Molina
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
本稿は欧州グリーンディールの公正移行の約束と現実の乖離を、ポーランド、ドイツ、スペイン、スウェーデンの4地域の事例から批判的に検討する。分配・手続・承認の3つの正義の次元を用い、脱炭素化の恩恵を最も受けていない地域と労働者階級が不均衡なコストを負担する「二重の不正義」を指摘する。この不均衡が政治的バックラッシュを招き、脱炭素化の社会的合意を損なうと論じ、参加型ガバナンスとエコ福祉国家に基づく新たな欧州社会契約を提唱する。
English
This article critically examines the gap between the European Green Deal's just transition promise and reality, using case studies from Poland, Germany, Spain, and Sweden. Applying three dimensions of justice (distributive, procedural, recognition), it identifies a 'double injustice' where regions and working classes that benefited least from decarbonization bear disproportionate costs. It argues this fuels political backlash and proposes a New European Social Contract with participatory governance and an Eco-Welfare State.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本のGX政策は産業競争力と雇用維持を重視するが、地域間格差や社会的公正への配慮は相対的に弱い。本稿の「二重の不正義」の概念は、日本の炭素依存地域（例：北海道、福岡）の移行政策を考える上で示唆に富む。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global just transition scholarship by providing a comparative framework for assessing distributive and procedural justice in decarbonization. It offers insights for policymakers in regions with carbon-dependent industries, complementing the technical focus of TCFD/ISSB disclosure with social dimensions.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a nuanced framework for analyzing justice dimensions in energy transitions, useful for comparative policy research.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the risk of social backlash if transition policies ignore regional and class inequalities, informing policy design.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The European Green Deal frames climate neutrality as a project that must reconcile ecological and social justice, yet its implementation has exposed a persistent tension between ambitious environmental policies and the social and economic realities of carbon-dependent regions. This article critically examines the coherence between the European climate imperative and the promise of a just transition, drawing on four case studies: Upper Silesia (Poland), Lusatia (Germany), the coal basins of north-western Spain, and Upper Norrland (Sweden). Applying the three dimensions of justice (distributive, procedural, and recognition), it identifies a “double injustice” whereby the regions and working classes that benefited the least from decarbonisation bear a disproportionate share of its costs while being excluded from its opportunities. This distributive and cultural imbalance fuels a political backlash that populist and far-right actors exploit, undermining the social consensus required for decarbonisation. The article argues that reconciling ecological and social justice requires a New European Social Contract grounded in participatory and territorial governance, cultural recognition, and an Eco-Welfare State capable of addressing emerging socio-ecological risks, thereby placing the working classes of affected regions at the centre of a fair, democratic, and durable green transition.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.5565/rev/quadernsiee.150first seen 2026-08-20 04:36:48
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。