← 論文一覧に戻る

Techno-energy assessment within a municipal energy transition index for local energy-system planning

地方エネルギーシステム計画のための自治体エネルギー移行指標における技術エネルギー評価 (AI 翻訳)

Clara Andrada-Monrós, Elisa Peñalvo-López, Iván Valencia-Salazar, VICENTE LEÓN-MARTÍNEZ

Utilities Policy📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-17#エネルギー転換Origin: EU対象セクター: cross_sector
DOI: 10.1016/j.jup.2026.102284
原典: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jup.2026.102284

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、自治体レベルでのエネルギー移行を評価するための方法論的枠組みを提示する。技術エネルギー柱に焦点を当て、診断指標、効率改善、再生可能資源のポテンシャルを統合し、現在のエネルギー診断と技術的緩和能力を定量化する。地中海の自治体に適用し、3つのシナリオ(緩和、野心的、中立)で排出削減ポテンシャルを評価。結果は、政策立案者が持続可能なエネルギー行動を計画・優先順位付け・監視するための一貫したスケーラブルな方法論を提供する。

English

This paper presents a methodological framework for evaluating municipal energy transitions, focusing on the techno-energy pillar. It integrates diagnostic indicators, efficiency improvements, and renewable potential to quantify current energy status and mitigation capacity. Applied to a Mediterranean municipality, three scenarios (Moderate, Ambitious, Neutrality) achieve 55%, 70%, and net-zero emission reductions. The framework offers a consistent, scalable, policy-relevant tool for local energy planning.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本では、自治体による脱炭素計画(地域脱炭素ロードマップ)の策定が進む中、本手法は地域の技術的緩和ポテンシャルを定量化する枠組みとして参考になる。SSBJや有報開示とは直接関係ないが、自治体の政策立案や地域エネルギー計画のエビデンス強化に寄与する。

In the global GX context

Globally, this framework supports local climate action planning, aligning with TCFD/ISSB's emphasis on scenario analysis and transition planning. It provides a replicable methodology for municipalities to assess mitigation potential, aiding evidence-based policy and potentially informing transition finance at the sub-national level.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides a structured methodology for municipal energy transition assessment, useful for comparative studies and indicator development.

🏢実務担当者:Offers a practical tool for local governments to quantify emission reduction potential and prioritize energy actions.

🏛政策担当者:Supports evidence-based local energy planning and monitoring, aligning with national and international climate goals.

📄 Abstract(原文)

This paper presents a methodological framework for evaluating local energy transition processes through the Techno-Energy pillar of a Municipal Energy Transition Index, designed to support policy decision-making at the municipal level. The framework integrates diagnostic indicators, energy-efficiency improvements, and local resource potential into a unified structure that quantifies both current energy diagnosis and the achievable technical mitigation capacity of municipal energy systems. The methodology is structured around five pillars that collectively define the municipal energy transition, although this paper focuses exclusively on the techno-energy pillar, which formalises the assessment of energy flows and emission reductions. The approach is applied to a Mediterranean municipality, analysing current sectoral electricity demand, limited local generation, and associated emissions (124 kt CO 2 /year), while estimating the mitigation potential of efficiency measures and renewable-resource mobilisation. Three transition scenarios are evaluated. The Moderate scenario activates 35% of identified efficiency potential and 20% of resource potential, achieving a 55% reduction in emissions. The Ambitious scenario scales deployment to 45% and 25%, respectively, enabling a 70% reduction. The Neutrality scenario exploits the available technical potential (65% efficiency, 35% resources), reaching a configuration compatible with net-zero emissions. The results show that the proposed techno-energy pillar provides a consistent, scalable, and policy-relevant methodology to support policymakers in planning, prioritising, and monitoring sustainable energy actions, strengthening climate-policy alignment and evidence-based transition strategies.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。