脱成長とグリーンニューディールの政治的実現可能性：スウェーデンの政治家による経済成長と気候政策の関係の認識
The political feasibility of Degrowth and the Green New Deal: Swedish politicians on the relation between economic growth and climate policy (原題)
Filippa Werner Sellbjer
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
スウェーデンの政治家へのインタビューに基づき、脱成長とグリーンニューディール（GND）の短期的政治的実現可能性を検討。政治家は経済成長を気候政策の障壁ではなく、選挙での受容性を高める「政治的緩衝材」と捉える傾向がある。GNDとの親和性が高く、脱成長には懐疑的だが、長期的には成長依存からの脱却の必要性を認める声もある。
English
Based on interviews with Swedish politicians, this paper examines the short-term political feasibility of degrowth and Green New Deal (GND) approaches. Politicians typically view economic growth as a political buffer that makes climate policy electorally acceptable, not as a barrier. The findings suggest greater compatibility with GND than with degrowth, while some acknowledge that reduced growth may eventually be necessary, leading to the concept of 'sequential transitioning'.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本の気候政策においても、経済成長と脱炭素の両立は重要な論点。本論文の「成長を政治的緩衝材とする」視点は、日本のSSBJ開示やGX推進における政策コミュニケーションに示唆を与える。ただし、スウェーデン特有の政治文脈に基づくため、直接適用には注意が必要。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to global debates on the political feasibility of climate policy, particularly the tension between economic growth and decarbonization. It offers insights for policymakers in democratic systems on how to frame climate action to maintain electoral support, relevant to the implementation of ISSB-aligned disclosures and transition finance.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides empirical evidence on how politicians perceive growth-climate trade-offs, informing political feasibility research.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into political framing that could affect corporate climate advocacy and stakeholder engagement.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the importance of framing climate policy to align with growth narratives to ensure political acceptability.
📄 Abstract（原文）
This paper examines the short-term political feasibility of degrowth and Green New Deal (GND) approaches to climate policy in Sweden, focusing on politicians as change agents within representative democracies. While feasibility debates often emphasize biophysical and technological constraints, this study investigates how elected politicians understand the relationship between aggregate economic growth and climate policy. Based on interviews with Swedish politicians across national, regional, and municipal levels, the findings show that respondents typically frame aggregate economic growth not as a barrier to mitigation, but as a political buffer that makes climate policy electorally acceptable. Growth is understood to protect living standards, public spending, employment, and Sweden’s international demonstration role, thereby allowing climate action to proceed without visible sacrifices or trade-offs. The results suggest greater short-term compatibility with GND approaches than with degrowth-oriented critiques of growth dependence, but also show that some respondents do not reject the possibility that reduced aggregate growth may eventually be necessary. The paper therefore develops the notion of ‘sequential transitioning’, arguing that politically feasible pathways beyond aggregate growth may depend on identifying early-stage decoupling measures that reduce the dependence of electoral acceptability on economic growth.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1080/23251042.2026.2712609first seen 2026-08-24 04:51:51
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。