gxceed
← 論文一覧に戻る

The Impact of Low-Carbon Transition on Accounting Conservatism of High-Carbon-Emission Enterprises: Evidence from China

低炭素移行が高炭素排出企業の会計保守主義に与える影響:中国からの証拠 (AI 翻訳)

Guomin Li, Shangwen Shi

Sustainability📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-06-02#トランジション・ファイナンスOrigin: CN
DOI: 10.3390/su18115638
原典: https://doi.org/10.3390/su18115638

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

中国の「ダブルカーボン」目標を自然実験と捉え、高炭素排出企業の会計保守主義が低炭素移行によって有意に高まることをDID分析で実証。資金調達制約とメディア注目が経路として機能し、非国有・東部・競争激戦企業で効果が大きい。

English

Using China's Dual Carbon target as a policy shock, this study finds that the low-carbon transition significantly increases accounting conservatism among high-carbon-emission firms via financing constraints and media attention. Heterogeneity shows stronger effects in non-state-owned, eastern region, and competitive firms.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

中国の二酸化炭素排出規制が会計行動に与える影響を実証。日本でもGX政策と有報・統合報告書の保守性との関連性を検討する際の参考となる。

In the global GX context

This paper provides causal evidence that environmental regulation shapes financial reporting conservatism, offering implications for global disclosure frameworks (e.g., ISSB) that link sustainability information with accounting quality.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:A novel empirical link between low-carbon transition and accounting conservatism, extending the literature beyond firm-specific risks.

🏢実務担当者:Highlights how carbon transition pressures can influence financial reporting strategies, relevant for disclosure teams in carbon-intensive sectors.

🏛政策担当者:Evidence that climate policies impact accounting conservatism, suggesting potential feedback effects on transparency and capital allocation.

📄 Abstract(原文)

As climate change challenges intensify, the low-carbon transition has emerged as a fundamental structural transformation reshaping the global economic system and promoting sustainable development. In China, the “Dual Carbon” goals announced in September 2020 represent a landmark policy shift that imposes substantial environmental and regulatory pressure on high-carbon-emission enterprises. Against this backdrop, understanding how firms are adjusting their financial reporting practices to align with the low-carbon transition holds considerable significance for fostering their long-term sustainable development. Unlike previous studies that primarily attributed accounting conservatism to firm-specific risks or general economic uncertainty, this paper views the low-carbon transition as a structural institutional shock that reshapes firms’ external governance environment and information conditions, thereby offering a policy-driven explanation for accounting conservatism. Analysis using the Difference-in-differences method demonstrates that the low-carbon transition significantly enhances accounting conservatism among these enterprises (coefficient = 0.008, t = 4.13). Furthermore, mechanism analysis reveals that the low-carbon transition increases accounting conservatism through financing constraints and media attention. Heterogeneity analysis further indicates that the relationship between the low-carbon transition and accounting conservatism is more pronounced in non-state-owned enterprises, firms located in the eastern region, those facing intense industry competition, and companies with low levels of green innovation. Overall, the findings suggest that accounting conservatism is shaped not only by firm-level factors but also by large-scale institutional and policy transitions. By emphasizing that environmental regulation is a structural determinant of financial reporting behavior, this study extends the accounting conservatism literature. Furthermore, it demonstrates that improving financial reporting quality and risk identification capabilities enhances firms’ ability to address the challenges of the low-carbon transition, thereby fostering their long-term sustainable development.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。