Sustainable Finance & Transition Economics in Asian Markets: A Comparative Study of the Capital-Market, Command-Control, and Concentration-Risk Models
アジア市場における持続可能な金融と移行経済：資本市場、命令統制、集中リスクモデルの比較研究 (AI 翻訳)
Md. Arif- Uzzaman
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
アジア6カ国（中国、日本、シンガポール、インドネシア、バングラデシュ、モンゴル）の持続可能金融へのアプローチを比較し、資本市場モデル、命令統制モデル、集中リスクモデルの3つからなるフレームワークを提案。各モデルには特有の弱点があり、共通して「約束と成果のギャップ」が存在することを指摘し、検証可能な環境成果の向上が次のステップであると論じる。
English
This paper compares sustainable finance approaches in six Asian countries (China, Japan, Singapore, Indonesia, Bangladesh, Mongolia) and proposes a Three-Model Framework: Capital-Market, Command-Control, and Concentration-Risk. It identifies unique weaknesses in each model and a common promise-to-performance gap, arguing that improving verification of environmental outcomes is the next step.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本は資本市場モデルに近いが、集中リスクも無視できない。SSBJやグリーントランスフォーメーション政策の文脈で、アジア諸国との比較から得られる示唆が重要。特に成果検証の重要性は、日本の開示制度強化に直接関連する。
In the global GX context
This paper provides a comparative framework for sustainable finance in diverse Asian financial systems, contributing to global discourse on transition finance and ESG verification. It highlights common challenges across market models, useful for international investors and regulators assessing Asian markets.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:Provides a comparative framework for sustainable finance in Asia, useful for scholars in climate finance and comparative policy.
🏢実務担当者:Offers insights into the challenges and gaps in sustainable finance implementation across Asian markets, helping corporate teams navigate regulatory diversity.
🏛政策担当者:Highlights the promise-to-performance gap and the need for outcome verification, relevant for regulators designing sustainable finance policies.
📄 Abstract（原文）
The biggest challenge that Asia is currently facing is to balance environmental responsibility and economic growth. Although many of the countries have introduced various green finance policies and ambitious climate targets, they continue to face various challenges due to how their financial system is structured. This report compares the approaches of China, Japan, Singapore, Indonesia, Bangladesh, and Mongolia towards sustainable finance through a comparative case-study analysis. The information used in this study was collected solely from the publicly available data, regulatory documents, central bank publications, multilateral development bank records, and financial news reports. Through the three case studies, this report developed a Three-Model Framework that consists of the Capital-Market Model, the Command-Control Model, and the Concentration-Risk Model. The framework suggests that each type of market model has its own unique weaknesses in implementing sustainable finance. Despite these problems, a common promise-to-performance gap exists across all three models, where sustainable finance is not defined by the commitments, but rather by measurable and verifiable environmental outcomes. The report further suggests that countries are unlikely to follow only one of the three models, as financial systems, technologies, regulatory frameworks, and climate policies continue to evolve over time. Instead, improving the verification of environmental outcomes should become the next step in strengthening sustainable finance across Asia.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.21412726first seen 2026-07-19 04:56:31 · last seen 2026-07-19 04:56:33
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録（無料・3キーワードまで）。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。