Costs of reducing ammonia emissions from the production of finisher pigs using best available techniques in Denmark
デンマークにおける肥育豚生産からのアンモニア排出削減の費用:最適利用可能技術の分析 (AI 翻訳)
Brian Jacobsen, Peter Kai
🤖 gxceed AI 要約
日本語
デンマークの肥育豚生産におけるアンモニア排出削減のための最適利用可能技術(BAT)の費用分析。スラリータンクの被覆や冷却が低コストで効果的。大規模農場の方が小規模より単位当たりコストが低く、二段階のBAT設定が有効。アンモニア削減20%以上を達成し、費用は13.4ユーロ/kg NH3-N以下。
English
This study analyzes the costs of reducing ammonia emissions from finisher pig production in Denmark using Best Available Techniques (BAT). It finds that covering slurry tanks and slurry cooling are among the cheapest measures. Larger farms have lower costs per unit than smaller ones, supporting a differentiated two-tier BAT system. The Danish BAT framework achieves over 20% ammonia reduction at costs below €13.4 per kg NH3-N.
Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.
📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters
日本のGX文脈において
日本でも畜産からのアンモニア排出削減が課題となっており、デンマークのBATフレームワークは参考になる可能性がある。ただし、本論文は直接的なGX(温室効果ガス削減)ではないが、間接的に気候変動対策に関連する。
In the global GX context
This paper contributes to understanding cost-effective emission reduction policies for agriculture, relevant to countries implementing BAT under the EU's Industrial Emissions Directive or similar. It shows how to balance efficiency and affordability, and supports differentiated standards for farm sizes.
👥 読者別の含意
🔬研究者:This paper provides a detailed cost analysis of ammonia reduction technologies in pig production, useful for researchers in agricultural emissions and environmental policy.
🏢実務担当者:Farmers and agricultural advisors can use the cost data to identify cost-effective measures for ammonia reduction, such as slurry covers and cooling.
🏛政策担当者:Policymakers can leverage the Danish BAT framework to design differentiated emission standards for farms of different sizes, balancing cost and environmental goals.
📄 Abstract(原文)
• There are many technologies available for ammonia reductions in Denmark. • Covering of storage and cooling are some of the cheaper measures analyzed. • Larger farms have lower costs per unit than smaller farms. • Setting BAT levels should be based on efficiency, affordability and cost-efficiency. The reduction of anthropogenic NH₃ emissions is essential for mitigating ecosystem eutrophication, limiting climate change driven by indirect nitrous oxide emissions, and improving human health. A key policy instrument in many countries is the implementation of emission standards based on Best Available Techniques (BAT), particularly in the context of livestock farm modernization and expansion. This study examines the Danish approach to defining BAT emission levels, which is based on three parameters: technological efficiency (emission reduction relative to a reference technology), affordability (increase in total production costs), and cost-effectiveness (cost per unit of NH₃ reduction). The analysis focuses on mitigation measures in growing–finishing pig (finisher pig) production as a case study. The results indicate that Denmark has access to a broader range of mitigation technologies compared to many other countries, including slurry cooling, slurry acidification, chemical and biological air scrubbers at varying intensities, and covering of slurry tanks. Multiple combinations of housing systems and technologies are identified that meet different parameter thresholds. Among these, slurry tank covers and slurry cooling emerge as the most cost-efficient options. From an affordability perspective, additional costs of up to 2% of total production costs (approximately €1.5 per pig) appear feasible; however, only a limited number of technologies meet this threshold. In terms of cost-effectiveness, several technologies can be implemented at costs below €5 per kg NH 3 -N, while a broader set remains viable below €10 per kg NH 3 -N. Overall, the Danish BAT framework achieves ammonia emission reductions exceeding 20% at costs below €13.4 per kg NH 3 -N. The analysis also highlights significant cost disparities between farm sizes, with smaller farms facing higher relative costs. This finding supports the continued use of a differentiated, two-tier BAT system. Finally, increasing estimates of welfare benefits associated with reduced ammonia emissions may justify stricter BAT requirements in the future; however, the determination of BAT levels ultimately remains a political decision.
🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース
- openalex https://doi.org/10.1016/j.nexres.2026.101871first seen 2026-06-03 04:46:58 · last seen 2026-06-13 04:30:37
🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。
gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。