← 論文一覧に戻る

OPEC AND CLIMATE ACTION: ADAPTATIONS FOR DEVELOPMENT IN THE GLOBAL SOUTH

OPECと気候行動:グローバル・サウスにおける開発のための適応 (AI 翻訳)

Kester Onor

Journal of Sociology Bulletin of Yerevan University📚 査読済 / ジャーナル2026-07-02#エネルギー転換
DOI: 10.46991/bysu.f/2026.17.1.055
原典: https://doi.org/10.46991/bysu.f/2026.17.1.055

🤖 gxceed AI 要約

日本語

本論文は、OPEC加盟国が気候変動対策と炭化水素依存型開発の矛盾にどう対応しているかを政治経済学的に分析する。サウジアラビア、ナイジェリア、UAEの事例から、経済多様化や再生可能エネルギー投資、象徴的なグリーンブランディングなどの適応戦略を明らかにする。結論として、OPEC諸国はエネルギー転換をレトリックとして受け入れつつも、炭化水素依存から脱却できず、気候脆弱性と経済的惰性の二重のジレンマに陥っていると指摘する。

English

This paper uses a political economy approach and qualitative data to examine how OPEC members (Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, UAE) navigate the tension between climate commitments and hydrocarbon-dependent development. It finds that adaptive strategies include economic diversification, renewable investments, symbolic green branding, and resistance in climate negotiations. The study concludes that OPEC states face a double-bind of climate vulnerability and economic inertia despite rhetorical embrace of energy transition.

Unofficial AI-generated summary based on the public title and abstract. Not an official translation.

📝 gxceed 編集解説 — Why this matters

日本のGX文脈において

日本のGX文脈では、OPEC諸国のエネルギー転換の困難は、日本が依存する中東産油国との関係や、脱炭素政策の国際的な推進に影響を与える。また、日本企業が進出する新興国でのエネルギー政策を理解する上で示唆に富む。

In the global GX context

This paper contributes to global GX discourse by highlighting the structural barriers to decarbonization in resource-dependent economies. It underscores the political and economic challenges beyond technical solutions, relevant for international climate negotiations and transition finance frameworks aimed at the Global South.

👥 読者別の含意

🔬研究者:Provides insights into the political economy of energy transition in petrostates, useful for studying climate policy and development conflicts.

🏛政策担当者:Offers understanding of OPEC countries' negotiation positions and internal tensions, relevant for international climate diplomacy.

📄 Abstract(原文)

The Organisation of Petroleum Exporting Countries (OPEC) has committed to combating climate change. However, this commitment has confronted its members with two contradictory imperatives. They are sustaining hydrocarbon dependent development and adapting to the global agenda for decarbonisation. As international climate discourse intensifies, OPEC’s traditional rentier models of statecraft face unprecedented strain. This study examines how climate change discourse is reshaping the material and economic environment of OPEC states in the Global South dependent on oil and natural gas rents. Using qualitative data and a political economy approach, the study analyses how OPEC states collectively and individually negotiates the pressures of climate change commitments and national development imperatives. Employing the case studies of Saudi Arabia, Nigeria, and the United Arab Emirate, the article highlights the adaptive strategies of these states. The study finds that these strategies range from economic diversification and renewable energy investments to symbolic green branding and resistance within international climate negotiations. The study concludes that while OPEC members rhetorically embrace aspects of the energy transition agenda, their developmental dependence on hydrocarbons creates a double-bind of climate vulnerability and economic inertia.

🔗 Provenance — このレコードを発見したソース

🔔 こうした論文の新着を逃したくない方は キーワードアラート に登録(無料・3キーワードまで)。

gxceed は公開メタデータに基づく研究支援データセットです。要約・翻訳・解説は AI 支援で生成されています。 最終的な解釈・検証は利用者が原典資料に基づいて行うことを前提とします。